[1]于风天,魏杰,王晓东.腓骨近端截骨术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗内翻型膝关节骨关节炎的疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(02):97-102.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.007]
　Yu Fengtian,Wei Jie,Wang Xiaodong..Comparative analysis of curative effect of proximal fibular osteotomy for the treatment of varus knee osteoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(02):97-102.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.007]
点击复制

腓骨近端截骨术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗内翻型膝关节骨关节炎的疗效比较()
分享到：

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2016年02期
页码:
97-102
栏目:
“不均匀沉降理论”在骨关节炎中的应用
出版日期:
2016-05-17

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative analysis of curative effect of proximal fibular osteotomy for the treatment of varus knee osteoarthritis
作者:
于风天; 魏杰; 王晓东
030001 太原，山西医科大学骨科；030001 太原，山西医科大学附属人民医院骨科
Author(s):
Yu Fengtian; Wei Jie; Wang Xiaodong.
Department of Orthopedic, Shanxi Medical University; Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated People’s Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
关键词:
膝关节; 　骨关节炎; 　腓骨; 　截骨术
Keywords:
Knee joint; 　Osteoarthritis; 　Fibula; 　Osteotomy
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.007
摘要:
目的　比较腓骨近端截骨术及胫骨高位截骨术（high tibial osteotomy，HTO）治疗内翻型膝关节骨关节炎的临床疗效。方法　回顾性分析2010 年6 月至2015 年6 月山西医科大学附属人民医院收治的符合纳入及排除标准的膝关节骨关节炎患者56 例，根据手术方式不同分为腓骨截骨组（n=29）和HTO 组（n=27）。随访并比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院天数、住院费用及术前、术后3 个月和6 个月的疼痛视觉模拟评分（visual analogue scale，VAS）、美国特种外科医院（hospital for special surgery，HSS）膝关节评分和美国膝关节协会评分（knee society score， KSS）。结果　56 例患者均获得成功随访，随访时间为6 ～ 60 个月，平均（6.6±1.1）个月。与HTO 组患者相比，腓骨截骨组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院费用、住院时间、切口长度均较少，差异有统计学意义（P ＜ 0.05）。两组间术前及术后3 个月、6 个月膝关节VAS、HSS 和KSS 评分比较，差异均无统计学意义（P ＞ 0.05）；两组患者术后3 个月、6 个月的VAS、HSS 和KSS 评分较术前均有明显改善，差异有统计学意义（P ＜ 0.05）。结论　腓骨近端截骨术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的短期疗效与HTO 相当，但其创伤小、恢复快、花费少，是一种可选的治疗膝关节骨关节炎的手术方式。
Abstract:
Objective　To compare the clinical effect of proximal fibular osteotomy and high tibial osteotomy (high tibial osteotomy, HTO) in the treatment of varus knee osteoarthritis. Methods　 A retrospective analysis was performed on 56 patients with knee osteoarthritis who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were treated in the Affiliated People’s Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from June 2010 to June 2015. The patients were divided into fibular osteotomy group (n=29) and HTO group (n=27) according to different surgery type. All patients were well followed-up, before and after operation (3, 6 months) The operative time, peri-operative bleeding, hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, the visual analogue scale (VAS) , hospital for special surgery knee score (HSS), and knee society score (KSS) of each patient were recorded and compared between these two groups. Results　56 patients were followed-up for 6 to 60 months, with an average of 6.6±1.1 months, and all cases obtained satisfactory results. Compared with the HTO group, the operative time, hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, hospitalization time, length of incision, and the length of incision were all lower than the fibular osteotomy group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). While no significant differences were observed in the KSS, HSS and VAS scores at preoperation, 3 months and 6 months follow-up (P>0.05). Intra-group comparison: the KSS, HSS and VAS scores of postoperation of the two groups were all significantly higher than preoperation, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion　The clinical effect of proximal fibular osteotomy and high tibial osteotomy is equivalent in treating knee osteoarthritis, however the proximal fibula osteotomy has advantages of small trauma, quick recovery, low cost, which is an alternative treatment for knee osteoarthritis.

参考文献/References:

1 B?rjesson M, Weidenhielm L, Mattsson E, et al. Gait and clinical measurements in patients with knee osteoarthritis after surgery: a prospective 5-year follow-up study [J]. Knee, 2005, 12(2): 121-127.
2 肖兴雷, 张志刚, 陈德生, 等. 胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝关节单间室骨性关节炎伴内翻畸形的研究进展 [J]. 中国医药指南, 2013, 11(35): 343-345.
3 张炅, 冯建民. 单髁膝关节置换的临床应用进展 [J]. 中华关节外科杂志:电子版, 2013, 7(4): 545-549.
4 蒋忠, 沈伟中, 骆园. UKA与TKA治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨性关节炎初期疗效比较 [J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2015, 30(4): 353-356.
5 张英泽, 李存祥, 李冀东, 等. 不均匀沉降在膝关节退变及内翻过程中机制的研究 [J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2014, 35(2): 218-219.
6 李存祥, 贾素华, 王健, 等. 单纯腓骨截断术治疗膝骨关节炎临床研究 [J]. 中国医学创新, 2010, 7(2): 115-117.
7 王娟, 王坤正, 陈伟, 等. 腓骨部分切除对髋、膝、踝关节影响的研究 [J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2015, 36(1): 84-85.
8 Chang A, Hurwitz D, Dunlop D, et al. The relationship between toe-out angle during gait and progression of medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis [J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2007, 66(10): 1271-1275.
9 郑占乐, 孙英彩, 张晓然, 等. 膝关节骨性关节炎发病机制的临床影像学研究 [J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2014, 35(5): 599-600, 621.
10 Yang ZY, Chen W, Li CX, et al. Medial Compartment Decompression by Fibular Osteotomy to Treat Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study [J]. Orthopedics, 2015, 38 (12): e1110-e1114.
11 杨延江, 郑占乐, 李坤, 等. 腓骨高位截骨治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的解剖学研究 [J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2014, 35(6): 724-725, 616.
12 黄承, 徐斌, 王瑞, 等. 关节镜清理辅助腓骨近端截骨术治疗伴内翻畸形内侧胫股关节骨关节炎 [J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2015, 23(9): 850-852.
13 Bozkurt M, Yavuzer G, T?nük E, et al. Dynamic function of the fibula. Gait analysis evaluation of three different parts of the shank after fibulectomy: proximal, middle and distal [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2005, 125(10): 713-720.

相似文献/References:

[1]白玉,王爱国,骆晓飞.腓骨近端截骨术治疗内侧间室性膝关节骨关节炎的疗效分析与机制探讨[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):161.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.007]
　Bai Yu,Wang Aiguo,Luo Xiaofei.The effect and mechanism of proximal fibular osteotomy in treating medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(02):161.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.007]
[2]白云波,魏文华,李健阳,等.关节镜清理结合腓骨近端截骨术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的疗效研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):97.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.006]
　Bai Yunbo,Wei Wenhua,Li Jianyang,et al.Clinical effectiveness of limited arthroscopic debridement combined with proximal fibular osteotomy in treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(02):97.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.006]
[3]杨秋军,吴占勇,孙国栋,等.腓骨近端截骨术治疗内翻型膝关节骨关节炎的疗效研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(03):167.[doi:DOI：10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.03.007]
　Yang Qiujun,Wu Zhanyong,Sun Guodong,et al.Clinical effect of proximal fibular osteotomy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(02):167.[doi:DOI：10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.03.007]
[4]李仕臣,王文革,赵二龙.腓骨近端截骨联合关节镜手术治疗膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):238.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.008]
　Li Shichen,Wang Wenge,Zhao Erlong..Analysis of therapeutic effect of proximal fibula osteotomy combined with arthroscopic surgery on medial compartment knee osteoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(02):238.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.008]
[5]张洪涛,朱鹤飞,梅继文,等.关节镜治疗老年膝关节骨关节炎合并腘窝囊肿的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(01):33.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.008]
　hang Hongtao,Zhu Hefei,Mei Jiwen,et al.Arthroscopic treatment of senile knee osteoarthritis combined popliteal cyst curative effect analysis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(02):33.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.008]
[6]吴海贺,左建林,李钊,等.国人膝骨关节炎患者关节线不均匀沉降的影像学测量及影响因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(02):105.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.02.008]
　Wu Haihe,Zuo Jianlin,Li Zhao,et al.Imaging measurements and influencing factors of non-uniform settlement of joint line in patients with knee osteoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(02):105.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.02.008]
[7]王坤正.膝关节骨关节炎的创新疗法—腓骨近端截骨术[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(03):129.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.001]
　Wang Kunzheng.New treatment of keen osteoarthritis- proximal fibula osteotomy[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(02):129.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.001]
[8]王秀廷,郭明磊,姜治辉,等.腓骨近端截骨治疗高龄高危膝关节骨性关节炎的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2019,(05):269.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.05.005]
　Wang Xiuting,Guo Minglei,Jiang Zhihui,et al.Analysis of proximal fibular osteotomy for the treatment of senile high-risk knee osteoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2019,(02):269.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.05.005]
[9]郑义,康凯,王智杰,等.中枢敏化及其对膝关节骨关节炎临床治疗的影响[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2020,(04):243.[doi:050051 石家庄， 河北医科大学第三医院关节二科]
　Zheng Yi,Kang Kai,Wang Zhijie,et al.Central sensitization and its effect on the clinical treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2020,(02):243.[doi:050051 石家庄， 河北医科大学第三医院关节二科]
[10]王志伟,索海强,梁寒光,等.不同来源的间充质干细胞在早期骨关节炎中治疗的特点比较及展望[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2020,(06):364.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.06.009]
　Wang Zhiwei,Suo Haiqiang,Liang Hanguang,et al.Comparison and prospect of different mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of early osteoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2020,(02):364.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.06.009]
[11]李博　李计东　刘丽君　曲磊　刘丽霞　贾媛媛　王海红　刘军.腓骨近端截骨术与口服药物治疗膝关节骨关节炎的对比研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(01):32.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.007]
　Li Bo,Li Jidong,Liu Lijun,et al.Therapeutic effect analysis of proximal fibular osteotomy for the treatment of patients withknee osteoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(02):32.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.007]
[12]杨朝君 孙智文 田洪涛.腓骨近端截骨术与人工全膝关节置换术治疗内翻型膝关节骨关节炎的短期疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(01):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.008]
　Yang Zhaojun,Sun Zhiwen,Tian Hongtao.Comparison on the short term treatment of varus knee osteoarthritis by proximal fibular osteotomy versus total knee arthroplasty[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(02):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.008]
[13]吴碧 王跃 郝鹏.腓骨近端截骨术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的研究进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(01):54.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.011]
[14]谢学然,朱培丽,乔源鑫,等.腓骨近端截骨联合关节镜下清理治疗中老年膝关节骨关节炎的临床疗效[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(04):217.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.005]
　Xie Xueran,Zhu Peili,Qiao Yuanxin,et al.Effect of proximal fibular osteotomy combined with arthroscopy debridement in senile knee osteoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(02):217.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.005]
[15]闫国富,薛晨晖,刘巍.腓骨近端截骨术治疗不同外翻应力角膝关节骨关节炎患者的疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.008]
　Yan Guofu,Xue Chenhui,Liu Wei.Comparison of the VgSA and the efficacy of knee osteoarthritis treated by proximal fibular osteotomy[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(02):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.008]
[16]王文革,李仕臣,赵艳东,等.腓骨近端截骨术和胫骨高位截骨术治疗早期膝关节骨关节炎的短期疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):91.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.005]
　Wang Wenge,Li Shichen,Zhao Yandong,et al.Early stage comparison of proximal fibula osteotomy and high tibial osteotomy to treat early knee joint osteoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(02):91.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.005]
[17]姚国军,尹淑梅,赵庆海,等.腓骨近端截骨与关节镜清理治疗膝关节骨关节炎的对比研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):103.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.007]
　Yao Guojun,Yin Shumei,Zhao qinghai,et al.Comparative study of proximal fibula osteotomy and arthroscopic debridement in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(02):103.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.007]
[18]霍丽丽,颉朝阳,崔小雷.腓骨近端截骨联合膝关节镜下关节清理术治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(05):306.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.011]
　Huo Lili,Xie Chaoyang,Cui Xiaolei.Proximal tibia and fibula osteotomy combined with arthroscopic joint debridement in treatment of knee osteoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(02):306.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.011]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
山西省科技厅项目（20150313012-3）
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-05-17