[1]张晟,余斌.个体化围手术期方案在高龄股骨转子间骨折治疗中的应用[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(03):132-136.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.002]
　Zhang Sheng,Yu Bin.The clinical experience of the perioperative management of intertrochanteric fracture with elderly highrisk patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):132-136.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.002]
点击复制

个体化围手术期方案在高龄股骨转子间骨折治疗中的应用()
分享到：

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
132-136
栏目:
髋关节
出版日期:
2018-05-23

文章信息/Info

Title:
The clinical experience of the perioperative management of intertrochanteric fracture with elderly highrisk patients
作者:
张晟; 余斌
510515 广州，南方医科大学南方医院创伤骨科
Author(s):
Zhang Sheng;  Yu Bin
Department of Orthopedic & Trauma, Nan Fang Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical Unversity, Guangzhou 510515, China
关键词:
老年人; 80以上;  髋骨折;  围手术期
Keywords:
Aged;  80 and over;  Hip fractures;  Perioperative management
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析个体化围手术期治疗方案在高龄转子间骨折治疗中的应用效果。方法 回顾性分析南方医科大学南方医院2008年7月至2016年1月收治的87例复杂高龄（80岁以上）股骨转子间骨折患者的资料，入院后评估患者心肺及认知能力、术前活动能力、骨折类型、个体化制定手术放案（髓内钉，髓外固定或外固定架）及麻醉方案（腰麻或筋膜阻滞），如无法手术则行保守治疗，记录患者入院至手术时间、术中出血量、手术时间、并发症发生率、30 d内死亡率、1年内死亡率、术后Harris评分及SF-36评分等来总结个体化治疗高龄患者的应用效果。结果 78例患者接受手术治疗，平均受伤至手术时间为（35±8）h（12～78 h），平均手术时间为（63±14）min（15～98 min），平均术中失血量为（263±121）ml（47～795 ml）。随访1年，8例患者伤后30 d内死亡，30 d死亡率为9.2%，另15例患者伤后12个月内死亡，1年内死亡率为26.4%，15例患者死于肺部感染，5例心功能衰竭，2例泌尿系感染，1例肺栓塞；2例患者发生手术相关并发症从而导致内固定失效，无医源性骨折发生；术后1年平均Harris评分为（73±4）分（66～87分），SF-36评分较术前显著改善。结论 高龄转子间骨折患者通过个体化术前合并症评估，制定个体化麻醉及手术方案，并尽可能伤后48 h内手术，有望降低死亡率并提高患者生存质量。
Abstract:
Objective To conclude clinical experience of the perioperative management of intertrochanteric fracture with advanced patients. Methods Data of 87 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture (over 80 years old) admitted from July 2008 to January 2016 in Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University were analyzed. Cardiopulmonary and cognitive abilities, preoperative activities, fracture type were carefully recorded, individualized surgical release (intramedullary nail, extramedullary fixation or external fixator) and anesthesia program (spinal anesthesia or fascia block) were designed accordingly. If surgery was not applicable conservative treatment would be used. The duration from to operation, blood loss, intro-operative time, mortality rate, complication rate, 30 d motality, 1 year motality, Harris score and SF-36 score were recorded for analysis. Results Seventy-eight cases were treated operatively, the average time from injury to surgery is (35±8) h (12-78 h). The average intro-operative time is (63±14) min (15-98 min), blood lose is (263±121) ml (47-795 ml). Patients were followed up for 1 year, 8 patients died within 30 days after injury, the mortality rate was 9.2% after 30 days. The other 15 patients died within 12 months after injury, the mortality rate within 1 year was 26.4%. Fifteen patients died of lung disease and 5 cases of heart failure, 2 cases out of urinary tract infection and 1 case of pulmonary embolism. 2 patients had operation-related complications resulting in internal fixation failure and no iatrogenic fracture. The Harris score at 1 year after operation was 66-87 points with an average of (73±4) points, SF-36 score was significantly improved compared with the preoperative. Conclusion Individualized preoperative comorbidities evaluation, individualized anesthesia and surgical protocols and ensure surgery performing within 48 hours for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures is possible to reduce mortality and improve patient quality of life.

参考文献/References:

1 Desjardins AL, Roy A, Paiement G, et al. Unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur. A prospective randomised study comparing anatomical reduction and medial displacement osteotomy [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1993, 75(3): 445-447.
2 Nicholas JA. Preoperative optimization and risk assessment [J]. Clin Geriatr Med, 2014, 30(2): 207-218.
3 Marsland D, Colvin PL, Mears SC, et al. How to optimize patients for geriatric fracture surgery [J]. Osteoporos Int, 2010, 21(Suppl 4): 535-546.
4 Cenzer IS, Tang V, Boscardin WJ, et al. One-Year mortality after hip fracture: development and validation of a prognostic index [J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2016, 64(9): 1863-1868.
5 Liema IS, Kammerlander C, Suhm N, et al. Identifying a standard set of outcome parameters for the evaluation of orthogeriatric co-management for hip fractures [J]. Injury, 2013, 44(11): 1403-1412.
6 Liem IS, Kammerlander C, Suhm N, Kates SL, Blauth M. Literature review of outcome parameters used in studies of geriatric fracture centers [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2014, 134(2): 181-187.
7 Kates SL, Mendelson DA, Friedman SM. The value of an organized fracture program for the elderly: early results [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25(4): 233-237.
8 Theodoros TH, Sheikh H, Stone MH, et al. Pain relief management following proximal femora fractures: Options, issues and controversies [J]. Injury, 2015, 46 Suppl: 52-58.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵晨,商培洋,车凌宾,等.锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折合并肩袖撕裂的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):22.
[2]吴斗,郝海虎,朱剑,等.老年髋部骨折术后谵妄的危险因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):34.
[3]高文双,曹建业,吴卫卫,等.墙壁拉力器训练对老年下腰背痛的疗效研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):39.
[4]姬晨妮,陈伟,朱燕宾,等.京津唐地区1 583例老年股骨转子间骨折流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):45.
[5]李石伦,鞠林林,陈伟,等.老年脊柱骨折的流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):50.
[6]杨延江　董天华　杜晨光　杨宗酉　陈伟　吕红芝　刘磊　孙家元　王海立　殷兵　 刘勃 刘松　张英泽.2008 年至2012 年河北医科大学第三医院 老年踝关节损伤的流行病学研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(02):35.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02 .007]
　Yang Yanjiang,Dong Tianhua,Du Chenguang,et al.Epidemiological analysis of elderly ankle injury in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2008 through 2012[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2015,(03):35.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02 .007]
[7]吕厚辰,唐佩福.老年髋部骨折患者死亡风险评价[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(02):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.009]
　Lyu Houchen,Tang Peifu..Advancement of mortality prediction of aged hip fracture patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.009]
[8]高延征,张广泉,邢帅,等.经皮椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗老年 Kümmell 病的对比研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):136.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.002]
　Gao Yanzheng,Zhang Guangquan,Xing Shuai,et al.Comparative analysis of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplastyon in the treatment of the elderly with Kümmell disease[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):136.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.002]
[9]于沂阳,刘勃,陈伟,等.2008—2012 年河北医科大学第三医院老年骨折流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):172.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.009]
　Yu Yiyang,Liu Bo,Chen Wei,et al.Epidemiological analysis of geratic fractures in the Third Affiliated Hospital to Hebei Medical University from 2008 to 2012[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):172.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.009]
[10]李玉龙,翁习生,董玉雷.老年全膝关节置换术围手术期并发症影响因素的研究进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):177.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.010]
　Li Yulong,Weng Xisheng,Dong Yulei.Research progress of influence factors concerning perioperative complications of total knee arthroplasty in aged patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):177.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目资助（81401777），广东省自然科学基金资助（2015A030310396）
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-22