[1]左照光,曾文波,汪国栋,等.缝合锚与克氏针张力带内固定治疗第五跖骨基底部骨折的比较研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2019,(05):250-254.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.05.002]
 Zuo zhaoguang,Zeng wenbo,Wang guodong,et al.Comparative study of suture anchor and Kirschner wire tension band internal fixation for the treatment of Fifth humeral base fracture[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2019,(05):250-254.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.05.002]
点击复制

缝合锚与克氏针张力带内固定治疗第五跖骨基底部骨折的比较研究()
分享到:

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
250-254
栏目:
足部骨折
出版日期:
2019-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative study of suture anchor and Kirschner wire tension band internal fixation for the treatment of Fifth humeral base fracture
作者:
左照光曾文波汪国栋蔡贤华刘曦明
430065 武汉,湖北中医药大学研究生院1 ;401120 重庆,重庆医科大学附属第三医院2 ;430070 武汉,中国人民解放军中部战区总医院骨科3
Author(s):
Zuo zhaoguang Zeng wenbo Wang guodong Cai xianhua Liu ximing
1Graduate School of Hubei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 4300652, China; 2The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401120, China; 3Department of Orthopaedics, Central Hospital of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Wuhan 430070, China
关键词:
跖骨 骨折 缝合锚 克氏针 治疗效果
Keywords:
Metatarsal Bones fracture Bone Suture anchors Bone Wires Treatment Outcome
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.05.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较缝合锚与克氏针张力带内固定治疗第五跖骨基底部骨折的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2013年6月至2018年10月接受治疗并获得完整随访的33例Lawrence-Ⅰ区第五跖骨基底部骨折患者的病例资料,根据内固定的方式不同分为缝合锚组 (15例)和克氏针张力带组(18例)。记录并比较两组术中手术时间、骨折复位满意程度、愈合时间及术后功能优良率。结果 缝合锚组和克氏针张力带组在骨折复位满意程度、愈合时间、术后并发症方面无差异,缝合锚组手术时间比克氏针张力带组短,两组手术时间比较差异具有统计学意义(t=-8.714,P<0.05),手术切口长度比较具有统计意义(t=-13.867,P<0.05),术中透视次数比较具有统计意义(t=-6.834,P<0.05),末次随访,按美国足踝协会(AOFAS)中前足功能评分,两组功能恢复差异有统计学意义(t=4.948,P<0.05)。结论 缝合锚具有简便、微创、有效、无需再取内固定等特点,与克氏针张力带相比,减少了手术时间,缩短手术切口长度并减少了透视次数,是治疗第五跖骨基底部骨折的一种有效方法。
Abstract:
Objective Comparison of suture anchor and Kirschner wire tension band internal fixation for the treatment of Fifth humeral base fracture. Methods Retrospective analysis of 33 patients with a fifth tibiofibular basal fracture in Lawrence-I were underwent treatment and complete follow-up from June 2013 to October 2018 according to the way of internal fixation, patients were divided into suture anchor group (15 cases) and Kirschner wire tension band group (18 cases). The intraoperative time, fracture reduction satisfaction, injury healing time and postoperative functional excellence rate were recorded and compared between two groups. Results There was no difference in the degree of fracture reduction, healing time, and postoperative complications between the suture anchor group and the Kirschner wire tension band group, The difference between the operation time of two groups was statistically significant (t= -8.714, P<0.05). The length of the surgical incision was statistically significant (t=-13.867, P<0.05). Comparison of intraoperative perspectives is statistically significant(t=-6.834,P<0.05). At the last follow-up, according to the forefoot function score of the American Foot and Ankle Association (AOFAS), the difference in functional recovery between the two groups was statistically significant (t=4.948, P<0.05). Conclusion Suture anchor is simple, minimally invasive, effective and no need to take internal fixation. Compared with Kirschner wire tension band, the operation time is reduced, the length of the surgical incision is shortened, and the number of fluoroscopy is reduced. It is an effective method for the treatment of the fifth metatarsal humeral fracture.

参考文献/References:

1 Shereff MJ. Fractures of the forefoot [J]. Instr Course Lect, 1990, 39: 133-140.
2 徐海林, 徐人杰, 王静, 等. 踝关节骨折的手术治疗 [J]. 浙江临床医学, 2005, 7(10): 1082.
3 Devries JG, Taefi E, Bussewitz BW, et al. The fifth metatarsal base: anatomic evaluation regarding fracture mechanism and treatment algorithms [J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2015, 54(1): 94-98.
4 Fleischer AE, Stack R, Klein EE, et al. Forefoot adduction is a risk factor for jones fracture [J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2017, 56(5): 917-921.
5 Ekrol I, Court-Brown CM. Fractures of the base of the 5th metatarsal [J]. The Foot, 2004, 14(2): 96-98.
6 Lawrence SJ, Botte MJ. Jones’ fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal [J]. Foot Ankle, 1993, 14(6): 358-365.
7 Wang X, Zhang C, Wang C, et al. Accurate determination of screw position in treating fifth metatarsal base fractures to shorten radiation exposure time [J]. Singapore Med J, 2016, 57(11): 619-623.
8 Wang X, Deng Y, Yu L, et al. Comparison of hollow compression screws and absorbable screws for the treatment of the fifth metatarsal fracture:Ankle function and fracture displacement [J]. J Tissue Eng, 2015, 3(1): 53-54.
9 Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, et al. Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development of standard rating system [J]. J Orthop Sci, 2005, 10(5): 457-465.
10 Polzer H, Polzer S, Mutschler W, et al. Acute fractures to the proximal fifth metatarsal bone: development of classification and treatment recommendations based on the current evidence [J]. Injury, 2012, 43(10): 1626-1632.
11 Gasse N, Luth T, Loisel F, et al. Fixation of split anterior tibialis tendon transfer by Anchorage to the base of the 5th metatarsal bone [J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2012, 98(7): 829-833.
12 Egol K, Walsh M, Rosenblatt K, et al. Avulsion fractures of the fifth metatarsal base: A prospective outcome study [J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2007, 28(5): 581-583.
13 Wu G B, Li B, Yang Y F. Comparative study of surgical and conservative treatments for fifth metatarsal base avulsion fractures (type I) in young adults or athletes[J]. J Orthop Surg(Hong Kong), 2017, 26(1): 2309499017747128.
14 Lutsky K F, Edelman D, Leinberry C, et al. A Prospective Evaluation of Complications after Use of Exposed Pins in the Hand and Wrist[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019, 144(3): 659-664.
15 李辉, 唐康来, 周建波, 等. 带线锚钉缝合固定腓骨肌腱治疗第五跖骨基底部撕脱性骨折 [J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2010, 26(12): 1090-1092.
16 Hong CC, Nag K, Yeow H, et al. Suture anchor fixation for fifth metatarsal tuberosity avulsion fractures: a case series and review of literature [J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2018, 57(5): 1030-1033.
17 时亮, 段亮, 董向辉. 早期负重治疗第五跖骨基底部骨折 [J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2019, 22(01): 50.

相似文献/References:

[1]马晓龙,刘强,吴斗,等.骨质疏松显微骨折早期发生发展过程的实验研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):129.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.001]
 Ma Xiaolong,Liu Qiang,Wu Dou,et al.Experimental study of osteoporotic microsurgery fractures in the early development process[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(05):129.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.001]
[2]宋会平,张柳.阿仑膦酸钠治疗老年女性严重骨质疏松症患者的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):141.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.003]
 Song Huiping,Zhang Liu.Effcacy analysis of alendronate in the treatment of severe osteoporosis in senile women[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(05):141.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.003]
[3]于沂阳,刘勃,陈伟,等.2008—2012 年河北医科大学第三医院老年骨折流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):172.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.009]
 Yu Yiyang,Liu Bo,Chen Wei,et al.Epidemiological analysis of geratic fractures in the Third Affiliated Hospital to Hebei Medical University from 2008 to 2012[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(05):172.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.009]
[4]冯博,郝定均,郭浩.经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的研究进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):185.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.012]
 Feng Bo,Hao Dingjun,Guo Hao.Research progress of percutaneous kyphoplasty treatment on senile osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(05):185.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.012]
[5]李坛珠,张保焜,莫小联,等.极高龄不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的髓内和髓外固定疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):17.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.004]
 Li Tanzhu,Zhang Baokun,Mo Xiaolian,et al.The comparative analysis of extramedullary to intramedullary fixations for unstable femur intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):17.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.004]
[6]王峰,雷涛,苗德超,等.经皮椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效对比[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(03):143.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.03.003]
 Wang Feng,Lei Tao,Miao Dechao,et al.Comparative analysis of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplastyon for the elderly severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):143.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.03.003]
[7]雷涛,申勇.老年骨质疏松性椎体骨折若干问题的探讨[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):248.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.010]
 Lei Tao,Shen Yong..A brief discussion of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):248.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.010]
[8]史冬立,贺宇,毕丛丛,等.疼痛管理在老年骨折快速康复护理中的应用现状[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(05):314.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.013]
 Shi Dongli,He Yu,Bi Congcong,et al.Research status of pain management of fast-track care in elderly patients with fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):314.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.013]
[9]马树伟.球囊扩张椎体成形术治疗急性与亚急性期骨质疏松椎体压缩骨折的疗效对比[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(06):341.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.06.005]
 Ma Shuwei.Clinical efficacy of percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of acute and subacute phase of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):341.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.06.005]
[10]刘曦明,陈龙,汪国栋,等.3D导航下微创空心螺钉内固定治疗中老年Tilt骨盆骨折的疗效观察[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(03):151.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.006]
 Liu Ximing,Chen Long,Wang Guodong,et al.The clinical efficacy of 3D image-guided minimally invasive screw fixation in the treatment of Tilt pelvic fracture in middle-aged and elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(05):151.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
湖北省自然科学基金专项(2017ACA099);湖北省卫生和计划生育委员会联合基金项目(WJ2018H0064)
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-10-23