[1]沈鹏程 朱立帆 蒋富贵 鞠文 徐能 李晓林.锁定钢板结合重建肱骨内侧柱治疗老年不稳定型肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(02):7-12.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02.002]
 Shen Pengcheng,Zhu Lifan,Jiang Fugui,et al.Clinical research of locking plate combined with medial column mechanical support for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2015,(02):7-12.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02.002]
点击复制

锁定钢板结合重建肱骨内侧柱治疗老年不稳定型肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析()
分享到:

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2015年02期
页码:
7-12
栏目:
骨与创伤
出版日期:
2015-11-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical research of locking plate combined with medial column mechanical support for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients
作者:
沈鹏程 朱立帆 蒋富贵 鞠文 徐能 李晓林
苏州市吴江区第一人民医院骨科;上海交通大学附属第六人民医院骨科
Author(s):
Shen Pengcheng Zhu Lifan Jiang Fugui Ju Wen Xu Neng Li Xiaolin
Orthopedic Institute of The First People’s Hospital of Wujiang, ; Orthopedic Institute of The Six Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University
关键词:
肩骨折 内固定器 老年人 骨折固定术
Keywords:
 Shoulder fractures Internal fixators Aged Fracture fixation internal 
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02.002
摘要:
目的 探讨锁定钢板结合肱骨内侧柱重建对老年不稳定型肱骨近端骨折患者术后肩 关节功能恢复的临床效果。方法 回顾性分析2009 年12 月至2014 年12 月间苏州市吴江区第一人 民医院骨科采用锁定钢板或传统钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折且符合纳入及排除标准的患者85 例,其中男 33 例,女52 例,年龄60 ~ 78 岁,平均(65.3±5.4)岁。Neer 骨折分型:二部分骨折37 例,三部 分骨折42 例,四部分骨折6 例。根据患者手术方式及术后影像学检查将患者分为3 组:传统钢板组 (23 例),锁定钢板肱骨近端内侧柱未获重建组(锁定钢板未重建组,34 例)和内侧柱支撑获重建 组(锁定钢板重建组,28 例)。随访并比较3 组患者术后肩关节的Constant 评分变化、肱骨头内翻 角度、术后肱骨头高度比丢失值、二次手术率及并发症发生情况。结果 85 例患者均获得满意随 访,随访时间14 ~ 42 个月,平均(16.3±3.6)个月。末次随访时3 组患者间Constant 评分变化、 肱骨头内翻角度和肱骨头高度比丢失值比较差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05),其中锁定钢板重建 组Constant 评分升高(33.5±4.2)最高、肱骨头内翻角度(1.1°±3.8°)及肱骨头高度比丢失值(0.02±0.01) 最少,锁定钢板未重建组次之,传统钢板组最差;锁定钢板重建组二次手术率(3.5%)较未重建组 (10.4%)和传统钢板组(30.4%)低,差异具有统计学意义(χ2 =7.774,P=0.021);锁定钢板重建 组术后并发症发生率为7.1%,未重建组为29.4%,传统钢板组为34.7%。结论 锁定钢板结合重建 内侧柱支撑固定肱骨近端骨折可减少术后肱骨头复位丢失和肱骨头内翻角度,从而提高术后肩关节 功能的恢复质量,使老年不稳定型肱骨近端骨折取得满意的疗效。
Abstract:
 Objective To study the clinical efficacy of the recovery of shoulder joint function and the maintenance of the fracture fixation after treatment by locking plate combined with medial column mechanical support for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the use of locking plate or traditional plate and follow-up of 85 patients with proximal humeral fractures between December 2009 and December 2014. The paitients included 33 males and 52 females, ranging in age from 60 to 78 years, at an average of (65.3±5.4) years. There were 37 cases of two-part fractures, 42 cases of three-part fractures , and 6 cases of four-part fractures according to Neer classification. The patients were divided into three groups according to surgical procedure and imaging examination, including traditional plate group (23 cases), locking plate without medial column reconstruction group (locking plate without reconstruction group, 34 cases) and locking plate with medial column reconstruction group (locking plate with reconstruction group, 28 cases). The change of postoperative Constant score of shoulder joint, humerus head angle, the loss of humerus head height and complications were measured. Results All of the 85 cases were followed-up after postoperative 14-42 months, with an average of (16.3±3.6) months, and all cases obtained satisfactory results. The differences in Constant score, humerus head varus angle, and the loss of humerus head height among the 3 groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). Locking plate with reconstruction group got the highest Constant score (33.5±4.2), and lowest head of the humerus varus angle (1.1°±3.8°) and loss of humerus head height (0.02±0.01), followed by locking plate without reconstruction group and the data of traditional plate group is the worst. The rate of secondary surgery (3.5%) in reconstruction group were less than group without reconstruction (10.4%) and traditional plate group (30.4%), and the difference had statistical significance (χ2=7.774, P=0.021). The rate of postoperative complications was 7.1% in reconstruction group, comparing with 29.4% in group without reconstruction and 34.7% in traditional plate group. Conclusion Locking plate internal fixation and reconstructing the medial column support could restore the mechanical stability of the proximal humeral fractures, reduce the occurrence of complications and improve the quality and recovery of shoulder joint function in elderly patients.

参考文献/References:

1 张雷, 杨国敬, 郑进佑, 等. 内侧支撑螺钉在锁定钢板治疗肱骨近 端骨折中的应用[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2011, 27:217-219. 2 Nho SJ, Brophy RH, Barker JU, et al. Management of proximal humeral fractures based on current literature [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89(Suppl 3): 44-58. 3 陈晓东, 王宇仁, 崔一民, 等. 锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端粉碎性骨折 [J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2008, 24(4): 203-205. 4 付中国, 邓磊, 白露, 等. 肱骨近端骨折锁定接骨板治疗术后并发 症分析 [J]. 北京大学学报: 医学版, 2011, 24(5): 666-670. 5 Krappinger D, Bizzotto N, Riedmann S, et al. Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures [J]. Injury, 2011, 42(11): 1283-1288. 6 曾浪清, 陈云丰, 刘燕洁, 等. 内侧柱支撑重建在锁定钢板治疗成 人肱骨近端骨折中的临床意义 [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2012, 14(7): 561-565. 7 Charles S, Neerii MD. Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures:purpose and reliable use [J]. J Shoulder Elb Surg, 2002, 11(4): 389-400. 8 Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1987, 214(214): 160-164. 9 Matejci? A, Vidovi? D, Ivica M, et al. Internal fixation with locking plate of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: complications and functional outcome [J]. Acta Clin Croat, 2013, 52(1): 17-22. 10 Friess DM, Attia A. Locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: a comparison with other fixation techniques [J]. Orthopedics, 2008, 31(12):1183-1190. 11 赵金华. 肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端Neer Ⅲ、Ⅳ型骨折 [J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2014, 17(1): 63-64. 12 赵晨, 商培洋, 车凌宾, 等. 锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折合并 肩袖撕裂的疗效分析 [J/CD]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2015, 1(1): 22-27. 13 Namdari S, Lipman AJ, Ricchetti ET, et al. Fixation strategies to prevent screw cut-out and malreduction in proximal humeral fracture fixation [J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2012, 4(4): 321-324. 14 Spross C, Platz A, Rufibach K, et al. The PHILOS plate for proximal humeral fractures--risk factors for complications at one year [J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2012, 72(3): 783-792. 15 韦盛旺, 赵友明, 杨杰, 等. 锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折术后并发 症的相关因素分析 [J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2012, 27(1): 15-17. 16 Liew AS, Johnson JA, Patterson SD, et al. Effect of screw placement on fixation in the humeral head [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2001, 9(5): 423-426. 17 Zhang W, Zeng L, Liu Y, et al. The mechanical benefit of medial support screws in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures [J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(8): e103297. 18 曾浪清, 陈云丰, 唐三元, 等. 不同内侧柱支撑重建对锁定钢板固 定治疗肱骨近端骨折的影响 [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2014, 26(1): 6-11. 19 郭伟军, 赵友明, 王新华, 等. 锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折内侧 柱支撑螺钉数量与其疗效的相关性研究 [J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2015, 35(1): 40-47. 20 朱加亮, 杨润功, 吴克俭, 等. 肱骨近端锁定钢板结合同种异体腓 骨头髓腔植入治疗老年粉碎性肱骨近端骨折 [J]. 中国骨与关节杂 志, 2013 (11): 632-636.

相似文献/References:

[1]邵明昊 吕飞舟 马晓生 夏新雷 王洪立 郑超君 张帆 姜建元.腰椎皮质骨钉道螺钉在骨质疏松症患者中 应用的三维有限元分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(02):1.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02.001]
 Shao Minghao,Lyu Feizhou,Ma Xiaosheng,et al.Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory in osteoporosis : a finite element study[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2015,(02):1.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02.001]
[2]李华,杨维杰,田建平,等.单侧与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定结合 TLIF治疗老年退行性腰椎疾患的临床研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(04):205.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.003]
 Li Hua,Yang Weijie,Tian Jianping,et al.Clinical efficiency of unilateral vs bilateral pedicle screws system combined with TLIF for lumbar degenerative disease in elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(02):205.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.003]
[3]黄伟敏,于秀淳,梁进,等.PEEK棒椎弓根螺钉系统治疗老年腰椎退行性疾病的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(04):211.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.004]
 Huang Weimin,Yu Xiuchun,et al.Clinical outcome of PEEK rod pedicle screw system for senile lumbar degenerative disease[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(02):211.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.004]
[4]侯建伟,谢仁国,李玉前,等.加长型 PFNA-Ⅱ和DHS治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨转子下骨折的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):22.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.005]
 Hou Jianwei,Xie Renguo,Li Yuqian,et al.Clinical effective analysis of lengthened PFNA- II fixation and dynamic hip screw for senile osteoporotic subtrochanteric fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(02):22.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.005]
[5]马永刚,王伟,王坤正.接骨板内固定与手法复位石膏外固定治疗老年桡骨远端关节内骨折的疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):65.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.001]
 MaYonggang,Wang Wei,Wang Kunzheng.Comparison of efficacy between plate fixation with manual reduction and plaster external fixation in elderly intra-articular distal radial fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(02):65.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.001]
[6]宫福良,田康,李杰.髓内外内固定治疗老年人股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(06):356.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.06.008]
 Gong Fuliang,Tian Kang,Li Jie..Comparative study of different internal fixation methods for the treatment of senile intertrochanteric fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(02):356.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.06.008]
[7]李祖涛,缪晓刚,周文正,等.钢板系统治疗髓内固定失败的股骨无菌性骨不连疗效观察[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(04):198.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.04.002]
 Li Zutao,Miao Xiaogang,Zhou Wenzheng,et al.Treatment of femur aseptic non-unions after intramedullary nailing interfixation with locking plate[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(02):198.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.04.002]
[8]方源 丁昌荣 王英振 张海宁. 多孔涂层钽金属棒系统治疗早期非创伤性股骨头坏死的临床对比研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(05):271.
 Fang Yuan,Ding Changrong,Wang Yingzhen,et al.Clinical comparative study of porous coated tantalum rod system in the early nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(02):271.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
苏州市科技局项目(SYS201502)
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-12-30