[1]迪力夏提·多力坤,郑龙坡.顺势复位治疗胫骨平台骨折的临床研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(03):163-167.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.008]
　Dilixiati Duolikun,Zheng Longpo.Clinical study of homeopathic bidirection-traction reduction device for tibial plateau fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):163-167.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.008]
点击复制

顺势复位治疗胫骨平台骨折的临床研究()
分享到：

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
163-167
栏目:
膝关节
出版日期:
2018-05-23

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical study of homeopathic bidirection-traction reduction device for tibial plateau fractures
作者:
迪力夏提·多力坤; 郑龙坡
200072 同济大学附属第十人民医院（上海市第十人民医院）骨科
Author(s):
Dilixiati Duolikun;  Zheng Longpo
Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
关键词:
胫骨骨折;  外科手术; 微创性;  牵引术;  顺势复位
Keywords:
Tibial fractures;  Suigical procedures;  minimally invasive;  Traction;  Homeopathic reduction
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨应用顺势复位治疗胫骨平台骨折的临床效果。方法 采用回顾性病例对照研究分析上海市第十人民医院2016年1月～2017年4月收治的87例胫骨平台骨折患者的临床资料。按照治疗方法将患者分为顺势复位组和切开复位组。顺势复位组应用顺势双反牵引复位器复位，共47例，切开复位组共40例，两组患者均采用锁定钢板内固定。比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量及术后6个月时根据Rasmussen影像学评分评估的患侧膝关节功能恢复情况。结果 所有患者均获随访，随访时间5～8个月，平均为（6.4±1.0）个月，顺势复位组手术时间为（108±15）min，切开复位组为（129±16）min，两组数据差异有统计学意义（t＝6.295，P＜0.05）；顺势复位组术中出血量为（67±23）ml，切开复位组为（93±22）ml，两组数据差异有统计学意义（t＝5.313，P＜0.05）；Rasmussen影像学评分顺势复位组平均分数（23±4），优良率80.9%，切开复位组平均分数（20±5），优良率为65%，两组数据差异有统计学意义（t=4.599，P＜0.05）。两组患者均得到骨性愈合，均未出现复位丢失、钢板松动及断裂等情况；切开复位组有3例患者术后出现切口感染，予加强抗感染消毒换药后均愈合良好。结论 顺势复位治疗胫骨平台骨折成功率高，与切开复位比较，可缩短手术时间，减少术中出血量，膝关节功能恢复良好。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of homeopathic bidirection-traction reduction device in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures. Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analys the clinical data of 87 patients with tibial plateau fractures who were treated in Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital from January 2016 to April 2017. According to the method of treatment, patients were divided into the bidirection-traction group and open reduction group. The bidirection-traction group applied homeopathic bidirection-traction device (47 cases), open reduction group including 40 cases, both group used locking plate fixation. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss and functional recovery of the affected knee were evaluated by Rasmussen imaging score at 6 months after operation. Results All patients were followed up for 5-8 months with an average of (6.4±1.0) months. The duration of operation was (108±15) min for the bidirection-traction group and (129±16) min for the open reduction group, there was significant difference between two groups (t=6.295, P<0.05). The blood loss in the bidirection-traction group was (67±23) ml and the open reduction group was (93±22) ml (t=5.313, P<0.05). The mean score of Rasmussen imaging score was (23±04), the excellent and good rate was 80.9%, and the average score of open reduction was (20±5), the excellent and good rate was 65%. There was significant difference between two groups (t=4.599, P<0.05). Both groups got bony union without loss of restitution, looseness and plate rupture. In the open reduction group, there were 3 incision infection after operation, which healed well after strengthening anti-infective dressing. Conclusions Homeopathy reduction has a high success rate in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures. Compared with open reduction, it can shorten the operation time, reduce the intraoperative blood loss and restore the knee joint function well.

参考文献/References:

1 Ruffolo MR, Gettys FK, Montijo HE, et al. Complications of High-Energy bicondylartibial plateau fractures treated with dual plating through 2 incisions [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2015, 29（2): 85-90.
2 Morris BJ, Unger RZ, Archer KR, et al. Risk factors of infection after ORIF of bicondylartibial plateau fractures [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2013, 27（9): e196-e200.
3 Moorcroft CI, Thomas PB, Ogrodnik PJ, et al. A device for improved reduction of tibial fractures treated with external fixation [J]. ProcInstMechEng H, 2000, 214（5): 449-457.
4 罗东斌, 张永, 汤永南, 等. 双切口双钢板内固定与单侧锁定钢板内固定治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折的疗效比较 [J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2016, 36（6): 1413-1415.
5 刘青林, 姜丰山, 孙世伟. 双切口双钢板内固定治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折 [J]. 中医正骨, 2012, 24（3): 54-55, 57.
6 Onoda Y, Hagiwara Y, Ando A, et al. Joint haemorrhage partly accelerated immobilization-induced synovial adhesions and capsular shortening in rats [J]. Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc, 2014, 22（11): 2874-2883.
7 Lin S, Mauffrey C, Hammerberg EM, et al. Surgical site infection after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures [J]. Eur J OrthopSurgTraumatol, 2014, 24（5): 797-803.
8 Zhao XW, Ma JX, Ma XL, et al. A meta-analysis of external fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures [J]. Int J Surg, 2017, 39: 65-73.
9 陈奇, 徐晓峰, 黄永辉, 等. 膝关节囊外复位内固定治疗胫骨平台骨折的疗效观察 [J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2014 （12): 1464-1468.
10 潘月帆, 黄俊文, 黄安劲, 等. 关节镜辅助下微创治疗SchatzkerⅠ-Ⅳ型胫骨平台骨折的临床研究 [J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2016, 9（1): 53-56.
11 王健, 唐晓波, 董佩龙. 胫骨平台骨折关节镜监视下复位内固定与切开复位内固定的疗效比较 [J]. 中华关节外科杂志:电子版, 2013, 7（4): 469-472.
12 Wang Z, Tang Z, Liu C, et al. Comparison of outcome of ARIF and ORIF in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures [J]. Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc, 2017, 25（2): 578-583.
13 张英泽. 尊重科学规律不断求实创新 [J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2017, 3（1): 1-3.
14 叶丹丹, 李升, 侯志勇, 等. 牵引复位器治疗四肢长骨骨折的生物力学特性分析 [J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2017, 38（10): 1229-1231.
15 陈伟, 魏宁, 杜晨光,等. 顺势双反牵引复位和牵引床复位对手术治疗老年股骨转子间骨折疗效的影响[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2017, 33（4): 332-336.
16 Li DQ, Song DY, Ni JD, et al. A case report of Schatzker type VI tibial plateau fracture treated with double reverse traction closed reduction combined with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis technique: A case report [J]. Medicine, 2017, 96（45): e8394.
17 Chen W, Zhang T, Wang J, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of displaced femoral shaft fractures with a rapid reductor and intramedullary nail fixation [J]. IntOrthop, 2016, 40（1): 167-172.
18 常恒瑞, 于沂阳, 邢欣, 等. 顺势牵引微创治疗胫骨平台骨折 [J]. 中华关节外科杂志:电子版, 2017, 11（1): 23-27.
19 唐鹏, 郭书权, 刘剑, 等. 双反牵引闭合复位微创治疗SchatzkerⅡ-Ⅲ型胫骨平台骨折的临床效果 [J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2016, 36（9): 1322-1326.
20 郑占乐, 常恒瑞, 于沂阳, 等. 胫骨平台骨折微创复位固定要点 [J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2016, 37（12): 1469-1472.

相似文献/References:

[1]宇文培之,王娟,吕红芝,等.高原（云贵）和盆地（四川）成人胫骨平台骨折的流行病学特点[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(02):103.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.008]
　Yuwen Peizhi,Wang Juan,Lyu Hongzhi,et al.Epidemiological characters of adult tibial plateau fractures in Yunnan-Guizhou plateau and Sichuan basin[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):103.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.008]
[2]郑占乐,常恒瑞,吕红芝,等.胫骨平台骨折张氏微创手术中研磨复位技术处理过度复位的临床研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(03):157.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.03.005]
　Zheng Zhanle,Chang Hengrui,Lyu Hongzhi,et al.Zhang’s minimally invasive treatment-the clinical application of grinding reduction in treating tibial plateau fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):157.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.03.005]
[3]贾建波,禹宝庆,吴良浩,等.传统后路与微创 SuperPath入路的半髋置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
　Jia Jianbo,Yu Baoqing,Wu Lianghao,et al.Hip hemiarthroplasty for senile femoral neck fractures: minimally invasive SuperPath approach versus traditional posterior approach[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
[4]邵佳申,郑占乐,吕红芝,等.双反牵引微创治疗后外侧胫骨平台骨折的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(05):302.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.010]
　Shao Jiashen,Zheng Zhanle,Lyu Hongzhi,et al.Bidirectional minimally invasive treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):302.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.010]
[5]张超,王国文,韩秀鑫,等.肿瘤型假体置换治疗老年股骨上段转移瘤的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(06):332.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.06.003]
　Zhang Chao,Wang Guowen,Han Xiuxin,et al.The analysis of the surgical of tumor prosthetic replacement effect on treating elder patients with proximal femur metastasis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):332.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.06.003]
[6]陆惠根,黄鑫,张中伟,等.肺癌脊柱转移瘤的手术疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(01):14.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.004]
　Lu Huigen,Huang Xin,Zhang Zhongwei,et al.The curative effect of surgical treatment for spinal metastases of lung cancer[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):14.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.004]
[7]丛锐军,仇荣敏,刘俊峰,等.顺势牵引复位技术治疗股骨干骨折的前瞻性随机对照临床试验[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(04):193.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.04.001]
　Cong Ruijun,Qiu Rongmin,Liu Junfeng,et al.Prospective randomized trial of homeopathic traction reduction technique for femoral shaft fracture[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):193.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.04.001]
[8]刘涛,鲍飞龙,亢世杰,等.顺势牵引微创治疗在下肢骨折中的应用[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(06):321.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.06.001]
　Liu Tao,Bao Feilong,Kang Shijie,et al.Homeopathic minimally invasive treatment in lower extremity fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):321.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.06.001]
[9]鲍飞龙 刘涛 亢世杰 黄东生 江涛 胡义明. 双反牵引装置治疗Schatzker分型Ⅴ、Ⅵ型胫骨平台骨折的优势[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(05):266.
　Bao Feilong,Liu Tao,Kang Shijie,et al.The advantage of homeopathic double reverse traction device treating tibial plateau fractures of typing Schatzker Ⅴ and Ⅵ[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):266.
[10]李伟,楼宇梁,全仁夫.脊柱后路PSO截骨长节段固定治疗 Kummells病伴脊柱后凸的临床疗效[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2019,(01):33.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.01.007]
　Li Wei,Lou Yuliang,Quan Renfu.The treatment evaluation for osteoporotic Kummell disease with kyphosis by posterior spine osteotomy long segment fixation[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2019,(03):33.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.01.007]
[11]亢世杰 胡义明 鲍飞龙 黄东生 江涛 刘涛. 双反牵引、微创复位及raft技术治疗后内及后外侧胫骨平台骨折[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(05):261.
　Kang Shijie,Hu Yiming,Bao Feilong,et al.Posteromedial and posterolateral tibial plateau fractures after homeopathic double reverse traction, minimally invasive reduction and raft technique[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):261.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：十三五国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFC0110600）
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-22