[1]王磊,高磊.PFNA-Ⅱ对老年股骨转子间骨折患者关节功能及并发症的影响[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2021,(03):152-157.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.03.005]
 Wang Lei,Gao Lei..The effect of Asian-type PFNA on the joint function and complications in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2021,(03):152-157.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.03.005]
点击复制

PFNA-Ⅱ对老年股骨转子间骨折患者关节功能及并发症的影响()
分享到:

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2021年03期
页码:
152-157
栏目:
髋部骨折
出版日期:
2021-06-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
The effect of Asian-type PFNA on the joint function and complications in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur
作者:
王磊1高磊2
075100 张家口市第二医院创伤骨科1;102300 北京门头沟区医院骨科2
Author(s):
Wang Lei1 Gao Lei2.
1Department of Orthopedics, Mentougou District Hospital, Beijing 075100, China; 2Department of Orthopedics, Zhangjiakou Second Hospital, Zhangjiakou 075100, ChinaCorresponding author: Wang Lei, Email: wangleiwg@126.com
关键词:
老年人 髋骨折 PFNA-Ⅱ 关节功能 并发症
Keywords:
Aged Hip fractures Joint function Complications
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.03.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨亚洲型股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA-Ⅱ)对老年股骨转子间骨折(IFF)患者关节功能及并发症的影响。方法 前瞻性收集张家口市第二医院2016年6月至2018年6月收治的160例老年IFF患者,按随机数字表分为PFNA-Ⅱ组和传统型PFNA组,每组80例。PFNA-Ⅱ组给予PFNA-Ⅱ治疗,男50例,女30例,年龄(70±6)岁。传统型PFNA组给予传统型PFNA治疗,男46例,女34例,年龄(69±5)岁。随访并比较两组患者关节功能、并发症、手术及康复情况。结果 160例患者获得完整随访,随访时间(16.4±2.8)个月。传统型PFNA组和PFNA-Ⅱ组切口长度和部分负重、完全负重、骨折愈合时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),PFNA-Ⅱ组术中出血量[(92±10)ml]和手术时间[(59±6)min]、透视时间[(2.7±0.4)min]、住院时间[(6.2±0.7)d]低于传统型PFNA组[(112±14)ml、(59±6)min、(3.4±0.5)min、(7.5±0.9)d],差异有统计学意义(t=10.276,t=8.946,t=8.748,t=10.442,均P<0.05);PFNA-Ⅱ组并发症发生率(7.50 %)低于传统型PFNA组(22.50 %),差异有统计学意义(c2=7.059,P<0.05);传统型PFNA组和PFNA-Ⅱ组术后6、12个月关节功能优良率(统型PFNA组:90.00 %、95.00 % ;PFNA-Ⅱ组:85.00%、92.50%)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 PFNA-Ⅱ也可有效改善老年IFF患者关节功能,且可有效减少患者手术创伤及并发症,有利于患者身体康复,值得临床推广。
Abstract:
Objective To discuss the effect of Asian-type proximal femora l anti-rotation intramedullary nail (PFNA) on the joint function and complications in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur (IFF). Methods The 160 elderly patients with IFF in our hospital from June 2016 to June 2018 were selected, they were divided into PFNA-Ⅱ group and traditional PFNA group, 80 cases in each group. The PFNA-Ⅱ group was treated with PFNA-Ⅱ, 50 males and 30 females, aged (70±6) years. The traditional PFNA group was treated with traditional PFNA, 46 males and 34 females, aged (69±5) years. The joint function, complications, operation and rehabilitation of the two groups were followed and compared. Results The 160 patients were followed up completely, the follow-up time was (16.4±2.8) months. There was no significant difference in the incision length and the time of partial weight-bearing, complete weight-bearing, fracture healing between the traditional PFNA group and PFNA-Ⅱ group (P>0.05), and the intraoperative bleeding volume [(92±10)ml] and the time of operation [(59±6)min], fluoroscopy [(2.7±0.4)min], hospitalization [(6.2±0.7)d] in the PFNA-Ⅱ group were significantly lower than those in the traditional PFNA group [(112±14)ml, (59±6)min, (3.4±0.5)min, (7.5±0.9)d], the difference was statistically significant (t=10.276, t=8.946, t=8.748, t=10.442, all P<0.05). The complication rate in the PFNA-Ⅱ group (7.50%) was significantly lower than that in the traditional PFNA group (22.50%), the difference was statistically significant (c2=7.059, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in joint function excellent rates between the traditional PFNA group and PFNA-Ⅱ group (90.00%, 95.00% vs 85.00%, 92.50%) at 6 and 12 months after operation (P>0.05). Conclusions Asian-type PFNA can also effectively improve joint function of elderly patients with IFF, and it can effectively reduce surgical trauma and complications, which is helpful to improve the physical rehabilitation of patients, it’s worth for further clinical promotion.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵晨,商培洋,车凌宾,等.锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折合并肩袖撕裂的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):22.
[2]吴斗,郝海虎,朱剑,等.老年髋部骨折术后谵妄的危险因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):34.
[3]高文双,曹建业,吴卫卫,等.墙壁拉力器训练对老年下腰背痛的疗效研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):39.
[4]姬晨妮,陈伟,朱燕宾,等.京津唐地区1 583例老年股骨转子间骨折流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):45.
[5]李石伦,鞠林林,陈伟,等.老年脊柱骨折的流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):50.
[6]杨延江 董天华 杜晨光 杨宗酉 陈伟 吕红芝 刘磊 孙家元 王海立 殷兵  刘勃 刘松 张英泽.2008 年至2012 年河北医科大学第三医院 老年踝关节损伤的流行病学研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(02):35.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02 .007]
 Yang Yanjiang,Dong Tianhua,Du Chenguang,et al.Epidemiological analysis of elderly ankle injury in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2008 through 2012[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2015,(03):35.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02 .007]
[7]李梦远,陈宏 马元琛,廖俊星,等.老年髋部骨折内固定失败后补救性髋关节置换术的临床研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(02):81.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.004]
 Li Mengyuan,Chen Hong,Ma Yuanchen,et al.Clinical research of hip arthroplasty as a salvage treatment after reduction and fixation failure in the proximal femoral fracture[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):81.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.004]
[8]高延征,张广泉,邢帅,等.经皮椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗老年 Kümmell 病的对比研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):136.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.002]
 Gao Yanzheng,Zhang Guangquan,Xing Shuai,et al.Comparative analysis of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplastyon in the treatment of the elderly with Kümmell disease[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):136.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.002]
[9]于沂阳,刘勃,陈伟,等.2008—2012 年河北医科大学第三医院老年骨折流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):172.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.009]
 Yu Yiyang,Liu Bo,Chen Wei,et al.Epidemiological analysis of geratic fractures in the Third Affiliated Hospital to Hebei Medical University from 2008 to 2012[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):172.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.009]
[10]李玉龙,翁习生,董玉雷.老年全膝关节置换术围手术期并发症影响因素的研究进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):177.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.010]
 Li Yulong,Weng Xisheng,Dong Yulei.Research progress of influence factors concerning perioperative complications of total knee arthroplasty in aged patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):177.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.010]
[11]吕厚辰,唐佩福.老年髋部骨折患者死亡风险评价[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(02):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.009]
 Lyu Houchen,Tang Peifu..Advancement of mortality prediction of aged hip fracture patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.009]
[12]陈述祥,刘彦,区文欢,等.老年髋部骨折术后肺部并发症的危险因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(04):239.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.009]
 Chen Shuxiang,Liu Yan,Ou Wenhuan,et al.Risk factor analysis for postoperative pulmonary complications in elderly hip fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):239.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.009]
[13]刘松 陈伟 朱燕宾 李彦森 殷兵 张飞 李佳 张英泽.2010—2011年中国东北和西北地区老年髋部骨折的流行病学对比[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(03):172.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.03.008]
 Liu Song,Chen Wei,Zhu Yanbin,et al.Epidemiological comparison of hip fractures in the elderly between northeast and northwest areas of China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):172.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.03.008]
[14]王东,周君琳.老年髋部骨折术后早期负重的时机及其影响因素[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(05):257.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.001]
 Wang Dong,Zhou Junlin.The timing and influence factors of early postoperative weight-bearing in elderly hip fracture patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):257.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.001]
[15]卢冰,王跃,刘攀,等.髓内钉及动力髋螺钉治疗老年稳定性股骨转子间骨折的比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(05):260.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.002]
 Lu Bing,Wang Yue,Liu Pan,et al.Comparison of the clinical efficacy between proximal femoral nail and DHS in the treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):260.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.002]
[16]宋婷婷,王新民,毕希乐,等.老年髋部骨折围术期心力衰竭的危险因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(01):23.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.006]
 Song Tingting,Wang Xinmin,Bi Xile,et al.Analysis of risk factors of perioperative heart failure in elderly patients with hip fracture[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):23.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.006]
[17]刘松,李佳,李石伦,等.中国华北和华东地区2010至2011年老年股骨转子间骨折流行病学对比分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(01):43.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.010]
 Liu Song,Li Jia,Li Shilun,et al.Epidemiological comparison of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly between northern and eastern China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):43.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.010]
[18]张晟,余斌.个体化围手术期方案在高龄股骨转子间骨折治疗中的应用[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(03):132.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.002]
 Zhang Sheng,Yu Bin.The clinical experience of the perioperative management of intertrochanteric fracture with elderly highrisk patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):132.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.002]
[19]张宇 秦晓东 许艺荠 谢文俊 胡军.老年股骨转子间骨折术后1年死亡率及危险因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(05):277.
 Zhang Yu,Qin Xiaodong,Xu Yiqi,et al.Risk factors related to mortality at one year after surgery for intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):277.
[20]王虎 李明 靳泽岳 连晓东 陈伟. 不同方法治疗老年股骨转子间合并转子下骨折的比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2019,(03):135.[doi:DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.003]
 Wang Hu,Chen Wei.. Comparative of different methods for the treatment of intertrochanteric-subtrochanteric fracture[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2019,(03):135.[doi:DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:邢台市科技计划项目(2016ZC066)
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-06-29