[1]马腾,黄强,许毅博,等.经皮双改锥微创与切开复位治疗难复性股骨粗隆间骨折的比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2021,(06):326-332.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.06.002]
　Ma Teng,Huang Qiang,Xu Yibo,et al.Comparative study of percutaneous double screwdriver minimally invasive reduction and limited open reduction in the treatment of irreducible femoral intertrochanteric fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2021,(06):326-332.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.06.002]
点击复制

经皮双改锥微创与切开复位治疗难复性股骨粗隆间骨折的比较()
分享到：

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2021年06期
页码:
326-332
栏目:
股骨骨折
出版日期:
2021-12-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative study of percutaneous double screwdriver minimally invasive reduction and limited open reduction in the treatment of irreducible femoral intertrochanteric fractures
作者:
马腾; 黄强; 许毅博; 路遥; 薛汉中; 李忠; 张堃
710054 西安交通大学附属红会医院创伤骨科下肢病区
Author(s):
Ma Teng;  Huang Qiang;  Xu Yibo;  Lu Yao;  Xue Hanzhong;  Li Zhong;  Zhang Kun
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hong Hui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710054, China
关键词:
髋骨折;  微创;  复位
Keywords:
Hip fractures;  Minimally invasive;  Reduction
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.06.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 本研究旨在比较经皮双改锥微创复位与有限切开复位治疗难复性股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。方法 回顾性收集2016年1月至2018年1月西安市红会医院创伤骨科下肢病区共收治145例难复性股骨粗隆间骨折患者，获得完整随访的患者共128例，其中66例接受经皮双改锥微创复位（A组），另外62例接受有限切开复位（B组）治疗。所有骨折患者均按Evans-Jensen进行分型，均采用股骨近端抗旋髓内钉（PFNA）进行固定。观察手术指标，包括切口长度、出血量、术中透视次数和手术时间。所有患者随访至少一年。统计骨折愈合情况、并发症及髋关节Harris评分。结果 128例患者获得完整随访，随访时间（19±4）个月。男性58例，女性70例，平均年龄（66±14）岁。A组和B组切口长度分别为（8.4±1.4）cm和（15.3±3.0）cm；出血量分别为（151±26）ml和（319±33）ml；术中透视次数分别为（14.1±2.9）次和（8.2±1.7）次；手术时间分别为（44±9）min和（73±11）min；骨折愈合时间分别为（55±12）d和（80±13）d。术后1年，A组和B组Harris评分分别为（86±4）分和（82±4）分；Harris评分优良率分别为92.4%和88.7%。经皮双改锥微创复位组切口长度更小，出血量更少，骨折愈合时间更短，Harris评分更高（P＜0.05）。结论 经皮双改锥微创复位技术在处理难复性股骨粗隆间骨折患者时，优于有限切开复位术。其可作为难复性股骨粗隆间骨折的首选复位方法，值得临床广泛推广。
Abstract:
Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effects of percutaneous double screwdriver minimally invasive reduction and limited open reduction in the treatment of irreducible femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods From January 2016 to January 2018, a total of 145 patients with irreducible femoral intertrochanteric fractures were treated in Xi’an Honghui hospital. 128 patients received complete follow-up, of which 66 received percutaneous double screwdriver minimally invasive reduction (Group A) and 62 received limited open reduction (Group B) treatment. All patients were classified according to Evans-Jensen classification and fixed with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA). The operation indexes were observed, including incision length, bleeding volume, intraoperative fluoroscopy times and operation time. All patients were followed up for at least one year. The bone healing, complications and Harris score of hip joint were counted. Results 128 patients were completely followed up. The mean follow-up time was (19±4) months. There were 58 males and 70 females, with an average age of (66±14) years. The incision length of Group A and B were (8.4±1.4) cm and (15.3±3.0) cm, respectively. The bleeding volume was (151±26) ml and (319±33) ml. The times of intraoperative fluoroscopy were (14.1±2.9) and (8.2±1.7). The operation time was (44±9) min and (73±11) min, respectively. The fracture healing time was (55±12)d and (80±13)d. One year after operation, the Harris scores of Group A and B were (86±4) and (82±4), respectively. The excellent and good rates of Harris score were 92.4% and 88.7%. Percutaneous double screwdriver minimally invasive reduction group had shorter incision length, less bleeding, shorter fracture healing time and higher Harris score (P<0.05). Conclusions The clinical effects of percutaneous double screwdriver minimally invasive reduction group was better than that of limited open reduction group. Percutaneous double screwdriver minimally invasive reduction technique can be used as the first choice for the reduction of irreducible femoral intertrochanteric fractures. It is worthy of clinical promotion.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴斗,郝海虎,朱剑,等.老年髋部骨折术后谵妄的危险因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):34.
[2]姬晨妮,陈伟,朱燕宾,等.京津唐地区1 583例老年股骨转子间骨折流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):45.
[3]裴宝瑞,吴啸波,李力更,等.应用低分子肝素钙预防老年髋部骨折术前静脉血栓栓塞症的剂量研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(02):76.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.003]
　Pei Baorui,Wu Xiaobo,Li Ligeng,et al.The efficacy of low molecular weight heparin calcium of preventive versus therapeutic dose in prevention of venous thromboembolism in elderly patients before hip fracture surgery[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(06):76.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.003]
[4]钟俊青,王连成.快速外科通道理念对老年股骨转子间骨折围手术期康复指导的前瞻性研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(02):87.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.005]
　Zhong Junqing,Wang Liancheng..Prospective study of the effect of fast track surery on peri-operative rehabilitation of elderly intertrochanteric fracture[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(06):87.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.005]
[5]吴啸波,裴宝瑞.老年髋部骨折围手术期相关问题的研究进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(02):114.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.010]
　Wu Xiaobo,Pei Baorui..Perioperative related problems of surgery in elderly patients with hip fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(06):114.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.010]
[6]张静,李志锐,唐佩福.老年粗隆间骨折的手术治疗进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(04):250.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.011]
　Li Zhirui,Zhang Jing,Tang Peifu.Progress of surgical treatment for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(06):250.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.011]
[7]侯建伟,谢仁国,李玉前,等.加长型 PFNA-Ⅱ和DHS治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨转子下骨折的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):22.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.005]
　Hou Jianwei,Xie Renguo,Li Yuqian,et al.Clinical effective analysis of lengthened PFNA- II fixation and dynamic hip screw for senile osteoporotic subtrochanteric fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(06):22.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.005]
[8]常晓,张保中,翁习生,等.高龄髋部骨折术后院内死亡的危险因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):43.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.009]
　Chang Xiao,ZhangBaozhong,WengXisheng,et al.Risk factor analysis for postoperative mortality in hospital of geriatric hip fracture patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(06):43.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.009]
[9]于沂阳,李石伦,陈伟,等.中国北方和南方地区 2010—2011年 60岁以上人群股骨转子间骨折流行病学对比[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):55.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.011]
　Yu Yiyang,Li Shilun,Chen Wei,et al.Epidemiological comparison of geriatric intertrochanteric fractures between north and south areas of China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(06):55.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.011]
[10]徐进,李平,马信龙.老年髋部骨折手术快通道化变革中的麻醉管理[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):59.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.012]
　Xu Jin,Li Ping,Ma Xinlong.Anesthetic management of immediate reparative surgery in elderly patients with hip fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(06):59.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.012]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：国家自然科学基金青年项目（81600700）；陕西省重点研发计划一般项目-社会发展领域（2021SF-243）
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-02-09