[1]鲁宁,魏立友,李亮,等.老年桡骨远端骨折小夹板治疗后早期腕关节功能恢复的相关因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2024,(04):222-228.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2024.04.005]
 Lu Ning,Wei Liyou,Li Liang,et al.Analysis of factors associated with early recovery of wrist function after small splint treatment of distal radius fractures in the elderly[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2024,(04):222-228.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2024.04.005]
点击复制

老年桡骨远端骨折小夹板治疗后早期腕关节功能恢复的相关因素分析()
分享到:

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2024年04期
页码:
222-228
栏目:
上肢骨折
出版日期:
2024-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of factors associated with early recovery of wrist function after small splint treatment of distal radius fractures in the elderly
作者:
鲁宁1魏立友2李亮3张玉龙4
063000 唐山市第二医院接诊室1,急诊科2,关节科3,创伤科4
Author(s):
Lu Ning1 Wei Liyou2 Li Liang3 Zhang Yulong4
1Department of Reception Room, 2Department of Emergency, 3Department of Joint, 4Department of Trauma, Tangshan Second Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China
关键词:
老年人 桡骨远端骨折小夹板 早期腕关节功能恢复 因素
Keywords:
Aged Small splint for distal radius fracture Early recovery of wrist function Factors
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2024.04.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 分析老年桡骨远端骨折小夹板治疗后早期腕关节功能恢复的相关因素。方法 回顾性分析2020年1月至2023年1月于河北省唐山市第二医院收治的515例均行小夹板治疗的老年桡骨远端骨折患者临床资料,男286例,女229例,平均年龄(75.82±7.64)岁。根据腕关节恢复情况分为恢复良好组(n=350)、恢复不良组(n=165),随访并比较两组患者一般资料(年龄、性别、体质量指数、优势手、骨质疏松、高血压、糖尿病、高脂血症)、临床资料(粉碎性骨折、掌倾角背伸、短缩畸形、骨折类型、肿胀、僵硬)及治疗相关指标(夹板固定时间、功能锻炼、畸形愈合)、腕关节功能评估量表(Gartland-Werley评分、Cooney评分),采用多因素Logistic回归分析老年桡骨远端骨折小夹板治疗后腕关节功能恢复情况的影响因素。结果 515例患者均获得完整随访,随访率100.00%,随访时间6个月~10个月。恢复不良组患者年龄≥75岁、骨质疏松占比明显高于恢复良好组(P<0.05)。恢复不良组患者粉碎性骨折、短缩畸形>5 mm、骨折类型CooneyⅢ Ⅳ占比明显高于恢复良好组(P<0.05)。恢复不良组患者夹板固定时间5周、无功能锻炼、畸形愈合占比明显高于恢复良好组(P<0.05)。恢复不良组患者Gartland-Werley评分[(12.36±2.07)分]明显高于恢复良好组[(4.52±1.39)分],Cooney评分[(78.72±4.16)分]明显低于恢复良好组[(90.26±3.45)分,(t=50.673、33.100,P<0.05)]。将单因素分析中差异具有统计学意义的因素进行赋值,同时进行多因素Logistic回归分析显示,年龄≥75岁(OR=7.471)、骨质疏松(OR=5.853)、粉碎性骨折(OR=3.785)、短缩畸形>5 mm(OR=6.841)、骨折类型CooneyⅢ(OR=3.904)、Ⅳ(OR=3.904)、夹板固定时间5周(OR=3.540)、无功能锻炼(OR=4.845)、畸形愈合(OR=6.366)、Gartland-Werley评分(OR=5.034)是腕关节功能恢复不良的危险因素,Cooney评分(OR=6.354)是腕关节功能恢复不良的保护因素(P<0.05)。结论 老年桡骨远端骨折小夹板治疗后早期腕关节功能恢复不良的概率较高,约占32.04%,其中年龄≥75岁、骨质疏松、粉碎性骨折、短缩畸形>5 mm、骨折类型CooneyⅢ、Ⅳ、夹板固定时间5周、无功能锻炼、畸形愈合、Gartland-Werley评分、Cooney评分等均为腕关节功能恢复不良的影响因素,临床可根据患者情况及特点给予针对性治疗方案,有助于改善早期腕关节功能,帮助患者术后快速恢复。
Abstract:
Objective Analyze the related factors of early wrist joint function recovery after small splint treatment for elderly distal radius fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 515 elderly patients with distal radius fractures treated with mini splints at Tangshan Second Hospital in Hebei Province from January 2020 to January 2023. There were 286 males and 229 females with an average age of (75.82±7.64) years. According to the recovery of wrist joint, the patients were divided into good recovery group (n=350) and poor recovery group (n=165). The general data (age, gender, body mass index, dominant hand, osteoporosis, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia), clinical data (comminuted fracture, palmar inclination back extension, shortening deformity, fracture type, swelling, stiffness), treatment related indicators (splint fixation time, functional exercise, malunion), wrist joint function evaluation scale (Gartland Werley score, Cooney score) of the two groups were followed up and compared. Multifactor logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of wrist joint function recovery after the treatment of small splint for distal radius fracture in the elderly. Results All 515 patients were fully followed up, with a follow-up rate of 100.00% and a follow-up period of 6 to 10 months. The proportion of patients aged ≥75 years and with osteoporosis in the group with poor recovery was significantly higher than that in the group with good recovery (P<0.05). The proportion of patients with comminuted fractures, shortening deformities greater than 5 mm, and fracture types CooneyⅢ-Ⅳ in the group with poor recovery was significantly higher than that in the group with good recovery (P<0.05). The proportion of patients in the poor recovery group who had a fixation time of 5 weeks, no functional exercise, and abnormal healing was significantly higher than that in the good recovery group (P<0.05). The Gartland Welley score (12.36±2.07 points) of patients with poor recovery was significantly higher than that of patients with good recovery (4.52±1.39 points), and the Cooney score (78.72±4.16 points) was significantly lower than that of patients with good recovery (90.26±3.45 points) (t=50.673, 33.100, P<0.05). The factors with statistically significant differences in univariate analysis were assigned values, and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥ 75 years (OR=7.471), osteoporosis (OR=5.853), comminuted fractures (OR=3.785), dwarfism >5 mm (OR=6.841), and fracture type Cooney Ⅲ (OR=3.904). Ⅳ (OR=3.904), 5 weeks of splint fixation time (OR=3.540), no functional exercise (OR=4.845), malunion (OR=6.366), and Gartland Welley score (OR=5.034) are risk factors for poor wrist joint function recovery, The Cooney score (OR=6.354) is a protective factor for poor recovery of wrist joint function (P<0.05). Conclusions The probability of poor early recovery of wrist joint function in elderly patients with distal radius fractures treated with small splints is relatively high, accounting for about 32.04%. Among them, age ≥ 75 years, osteoporosis, comminuted fractures, shortening deformities >5 mm, fracture types CooneyⅢand Ⅳ, splint fixation time of 5 weeks, reactive exercise, malunion, Gartland Werley score, Cooney score, etc. are all influencing factors of poor wrist joint function recovery. Clinically, targeted treatment plans can be given according to the patient’s situation and characteristics, which can help improve early wrist joint function and help patients recover quickly after surgery.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵晨,商培洋,车凌宾,等.锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折合并肩袖撕裂的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):22.
[2]吴斗,郝海虎,朱剑,等.老年髋部骨折术后谵妄的危险因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):34.
[3]高文双,曹建业,吴卫卫,等.墙壁拉力器训练对老年下腰背痛的疗效研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):39.
[4]姬晨妮,陈伟,朱燕宾,等.京津唐地区1 583例老年股骨转子间骨折流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):45.
[5]李石伦,鞠林林,陈伟,等.老年脊柱骨折的流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):50.
[6]杨延江 董天华 杜晨光 杨宗酉 陈伟 吕红芝 刘磊 孙家元 王海立 殷兵  刘勃 刘松 张英泽.2008 年至2012 年河北医科大学第三医院 老年踝关节损伤的流行病学研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(02):35.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02 .007]
 Yang Yanjiang,Dong Tianhua,Du Chenguang,et al.Epidemiological analysis of elderly ankle injury in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2008 through 2012[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2015,(04):35.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02 .007]
[7]吕厚辰,唐佩福.老年髋部骨折患者死亡风险评价[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(02):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.009]
 Lyu Houchen,Tang Peifu..Advancement of mortality prediction of aged hip fracture patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(04):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.009]
[8]高延征,张广泉,邢帅,等.经皮椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗老年 Kümmell 病的对比研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):136.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.002]
 Gao Yanzheng,Zhang Guangquan,Xing Shuai,et al.Comparative analysis of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplastyon in the treatment of the elderly with Kümmell disease[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(04):136.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.002]
[9]于沂阳,刘勃,陈伟,等.2008—2012 年河北医科大学第三医院老年骨折流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):172.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.009]
 Yu Yiyang,Liu Bo,Chen Wei,et al.Epidemiological analysis of geratic fractures in the Third Affiliated Hospital to Hebei Medical University from 2008 to 2012[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(04):172.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.009]
[10]李玉龙,翁习生,董玉雷.老年全膝关节置换术围手术期并发症影响因素的研究进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):177.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.010]
 Li Yulong,Weng Xisheng,Dong Yulei.Research progress of influence factors concerning perioperative complications of total knee arthroplasty in aged patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(04):177.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:中国民族医药学会科研项目(编号:2019KYXM-Z199-35)
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-10-12