[1]王昊 方诗元 王叙进 徐磊 杨家赵 李黎 刘雷.传统切开复位与顺势反向牵引复位微创固定治疗股骨远端骨折的临床比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(05):257-260.
　Wang Hao,Fang Shiyuan,Wang Xujin,et al. Clinical comparison between traditional open reduction and Zhang’s traction device for minimally invasive treatment of distal femoral fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(05):257-260.
点击复制

传统切开复位与顺势反向牵引复位微创固定治疗股骨远端骨折的临床比较()
分享到：

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年05期
页码:
257-260
栏目:
创新技术
出版日期:
2018-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
 Clinical comparison between traditional open reduction and Zhang’s traction device for minimally invasive treatment of distal femoral fractures
作者:
王昊 方诗元 王叙进 徐磊 杨家赵 李黎 刘雷
230001 合肥，安徽医科大学附属安徽省立医院创伤骨科
Author(s):
Wang Hao;  Fang Shiyuan;  Wang Xujin;  Xu Lei;  Yang Jiazhao;  Li Li;  Liu Lei
Department of Orthopedic trauma, Anhui Provincial Hospital, AnHui Medical University, He Fei 230001, China
关键词:
股骨骨折;  骨折固定术;  顺势双反牵引复位器
Keywords:
Femoral fractures;  Fracture fixation;  Homeopathic bidirectional traction reduction device
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
 目的 探讨顺势反向牵引复位微创固定与传统切开复位固定治疗股骨髁上骨折的临床效果比较。方法 采用回顾性病例对照研究分析2016年9月至2017年12月，安徽省立医院收治的32例股骨髁上骨折患者的临床资料，根据治疗方式的不同将其分为两组，传统切开复位固定术组（传统组）15例；顺势反向牵引复位经皮固定组（微创组）17例。均采用股骨外侧钢板固定，比较两组患者术中出血量、手术时间、复位时间、透视次数、术后一周膝关节HSS评分及并发症发生率。结果 全部患者均获得随访，微创组术中出血量为（170±27）ml，手术时间为（76±7）min，复位时间为（14.4±2.7）min，透视次数为（7.9±1.6）次，术后并发症发生率为6%，均优于传统组[（377±92）ml、（84±11）min、（25.2±4.6）min、（13.2±3.4）次]，差异均有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）；两组术后1 w HSS评分差异无统计学意义。结论 顺势反向牵引复位经皮钢板固定治疗股骨远端骨折较传统切开复位内固定手术时间短、术中出血少、复位时间短、透视次数少，术后并发症发生率低，并可达到较好的临床效果。
Abstract:
 Objective To compare the clinical effects of Zhang’s traction device and minimally invasive fixation combine with conventional open reduction and fixation for the treatment of distal femoral fractures. Methods A retrospective case-control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 32 patients with distal femoral fractures admitted to Anhui Provincial Hospital of Anhui Medical University from September 2016 to December 2017. They were divided into two groups according to different treatment methods. In the traditional open reduction and fixation group (traditional group), 15 cases were treated with Zhang’s traction device and percutaneous fixation group (minimally invasive group). The femoral lateral plate fixation was used to compare the intraoperative blood loss, operation time, reduction time, number of fluoroscopy, knee joint HSS score and complication rate. Results There was no significant difference in the general data between the two groups. The intraoperative blood loss was (170±7) ml, the operation time was (76±7) min, the reset time was (14.4±2.7) min, and the number of fluoroscopy was (7.9±1.6) times, the postoperative complication rate was 6%, which was superior to the traditional group. The difference was statistically significant (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in knee HSS between the two groups 1 week after surgery. Conclusions Reduction with Zhang’s traction device and percutaneous plate fixation for the treatment of distal femoral fractures has shorter reduction time, less intraoperative bleeding, shorter reset time, less fluoroscopy, and lower postoperative complications than conventional open reduction and internal fixation, this method can achieve good clinical results.

参考文献/References:

1 程家祥. 成人股骨远端骨折流行病学调查与分析 [D]. 石家庄: 河北医科大学, 2014 .
2 Smith JRA, Halliday R, Aquilina AL, et al. Distal femoral fractures: the need to review the standard of care [J]. Injury, 2015, 46(6): 1084-1088.
3 Wähnert D, Hoffmeier K, Fröber R, et al. Distal femur fractures of the elderly--different treatment options in a biomechanical comparison [J]. Injury, 2011, 42(7): 655-659.
4 Myers P, Laboe P, Johnson KJ, et al. Patient mortality in geriatric distal femur fractures [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2018, 32(3): 111-115.
5 王春生, 陈富春, 张子琦, 等. TKA治疗老年股骨远端骨折的应用分析 [J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2017, 23(6): 500-502.
6 Henderson CE, Kuhl LL, Fitzpatrick DC, et al. Locking plates for distal femur fractures: is there a problem with fracture healing? [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2011, 25(Suppl 1): S8-14.
7 Chen W, Zhang T, Wang J, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of displaced femoral shaft fractures with a rapid reductor and intramedullary nail fixation [J]. Int Orthop, 2016, 40(1): 167-172.
8 王娟, 李升, 臧砚超, 等. 应用四肢长骨骨折快速复位器治疗股骨骨折 [J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2014, 35(2): 220-221, 封3.
9 叶丹丹, 李升, 侯志勇, 等. 牵引复位器治疗四肢长骨骨折的生物力学特性分析 [J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2017, 38(10): 1229-1231.
10 张英泽. 骨折顺势复位固定理论在创伤骨科中的应用 [J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2017, 33(7): 577-580.
11 陈伟, 魏宁, 杜晨光, 等. 顺势双反牵引复位和牵引床复位对手术治疗老年股骨转子间骨折疗效的影响 [J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2017, 33(4): 332-337.
12 Southeast Fracture Consortium. LCP versus LISS in the treatment of open and closed distal femur fractures: does it make a difference? [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2016, 30(6): e212-e216.

相似文献/References:

[1]沈鹏程 朱立帆 蒋富贵 鞠文 徐能 李晓林.锁定钢板结合重建肱骨内侧柱治疗老年不稳定型肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(02):7.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02.002]
　Shen Pengcheng,Zhu Lifan,Jiang Fugui,et al.Clinical research of locking plate combined with medial column mechanical support for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2015,(05):7.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02.002]
[2]李梦远,陈宏　马元琛,廖俊星,等.老年髋部骨折内固定失败后补救性髋关节置换术的临床研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(02):81.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.004]
　Li Mengyuan,Chen Hong,Ma Yuanchen,et al.Clinical research of hip arthroplasty as a salvage treatment after reduction and fixation failure in the proximal femoral fracture[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(05):81.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.004]
[3]张静,李志锐,唐佩福.老年粗隆间骨折的手术治疗进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(04):250.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.011]
　Li Zhirui,Zhang Jing,Tang Peifu.Progress of surgical treatment for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(05):250.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.011]
[4]黄晓文,公茂琪,查晔军,等.早期快速闭合复位空心钉内固定治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的临床研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):4.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.002]
　Huang Xiaowen,Gong Maoqi,Zha Yejun,et al.Clinical results of early and rapid close reduction with internal fixation cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):4.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.002]
[5]黄鑫,苏柯,王晓宁,等.围手术期内科并存病对高龄股骨转子间骨折术后疗效的影响[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):11.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.003]
　Huang xin,Su Ke,Wang Xiaoning,et al.Influence of preoperative complications on the clinical outcome of elderly intertrochanteric fractures patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):11.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.003]
[6]李坛珠,张保焜,莫小联,等.极高龄不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的髓内和髓外固定疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):17.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.004]
　Li Tanzhu,Zhang Baokun,Mo Xiaolian,et al.The comparative analysis of extramedullary to intramedullary fixations for unstable femur intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):17.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.004]
[7]刘军,李计东,刘丽君,等.双反牵引复位经皮微创锁定接骨板内固定治疗股骨远端骨折的临床疗效[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):27.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.006]
　Liu Jun,Li Jidong,Liu Lijun,et al.The efficacy of double reverse traction combined with percutaneous minimally invasive locking plate internal fixation in treatement of distal femoral fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):27.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.006]
[8]马永刚,王伟,王坤正.接骨板内固定与手法复位石膏外固定治疗老年桡骨远端关节内骨折的疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):65.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.001]
　MaYonggang,Wang Wei,Wang Kunzheng.Comparison of efficacy between plate fixation with manual reduction and plaster external fixation in elderly intra-articular distal radial fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):65.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.001]
[9]陈佳,李西成.髋部骨折：争议与挑战[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):193.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.001]
　Chen Jia,Li Xicheng.Hip fracture: Controversy and challenge[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):193.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.001]
[10]佟大可,刘培钊,丁晨,等.股骨转子间骨折髓内固定复位丢失的预防措施及疗效评价[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):210.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.004]
　Tong Dake,Liu Peizhao,Ding Chen,et al.Preventive measures and outcome evaluation of reduction loss of intramedullary fixation for femoral intertrochanteric fracture[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):210.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.004]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
 基金项目：安徽省公益性技术应用研究联动计划项目（1401045022）
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-01-28