[1]张辉,庄万强,骆勇刚,等.关节镜下单排与双排缝合桥修复技术治疗老年肩袖损伤的对照研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2019,(06):337-341.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.06.007]
 Zhang hui,Zhuang Wanqiang,Luo Yonggang,et al.Arthroscopic single row and double row suture bridge repair in the treatment of elderly rotator cuff injuries[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2019,(06):337-341.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.06.007]
点击复制

关节镜下单排与双排缝合桥修复技术治疗老年肩袖损伤的对照研究()
分享到:

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年06期
页码:
337-341
栏目:
临床论著
出版日期:
2019-12-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Arthroscopic single row and double row suture bridge repair in the treatment of elderly rotator cuff injuries
作者:
张辉庄万强骆勇刚雷海魏庆华唐旭唐毅
641400 简阳市人民医院骨科
Author(s):
Zhang hui Zhuang Wanqiang Luo Yonggang Lei Hai Wei Qinghua Tang Xu Tang Yi
Department of Orthopedics, Jianyang People’s Hospital, Jianyang 641400, China
关键词:
老年人 肩袖损伤 缝合桥技术 肩关节 关节镜
Keywords:
Aged Rotator cuff injury Suture bridge technique Shoulder Arthroscopy
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.06.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 关节镜下采取双排与单排缝合桥修复术治疗老年肩袖损伤的效果对比分析。方法前瞻性收集简阳市人民医院2016年1月至2018年2月期间收治的118例老年肩袖损伤病患者,按随机数字表法分为对照组(关节镜下行单排锚钉固定)与观察组(关节镜下行双排缝合桥修复术),两组各59例,比较两组不同程度损伤患者手术前后ASES评分、Constant-Murley评分、UCLA评分;并对比两组术后再撕裂发生率。结果 治疗前两组四种撕裂程度Constant-Murley、UCLA、ASES评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后两组比较,只有轻度撕裂三种评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),而巨大、重度、中度撕裂的三种评分两组间差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组显著优于对照组。对照组再撕裂发生率17/59(28.81%)显著高于观察组6/59(10.17%)(c2=6.535,P=0.011)。结论 老年肩袖损伤采取双排与单排缝合桥术均可行,但双排缝合桥术应用范围较为广泛,且对于患者巨大、重度、中度撕裂改善效果更佳。
Abstract:
Objective To explore the clinical effect of double-row and single-row suture bridge repair for rotator cuff injury in elderly patients. Methods 118 patients with rotator cuff injury were randomly divided into control group (single row anchor fixation under arthroscopy) and observation group (double row suture bridge repair under arthroscopy). The ASES score, Constant-Murley score and CLA score before and after operation were compared between the two groups. The incidence of re-tear after surgery between two groups were compared. Results There was no significant difference in the Constant-Murley, UCLA and ASES scores of the four tear degrees before treatment (P>0.05), there was no significant difference in the three scores of mild tear between the two groups after treatment (P>0.05), but there were significant differences in the three scores of large, severe and moderate tear between the two groups (P<0.05). It is better than the control group. The rate of re-tearing in the control group (17 cases) (28.81%) was significantly higher than that in the observation group (6/59) (10.17%) (c2=6.535, P=0.011). Conclusion Both double-row and single-row suture bridges are feasible for rotator cuff injury in the elderly, but double-row suture bridges are widely used and can be used to treat huge, severe and moderate tears.

参考文献/References:

1 姚晓滨. 老年性肩袖损伤肩关节镜下修复术的临床研究 [J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2015, 35(21): 6204-6205.
2 任江涛, 徐丛. 关节镜下缝线桥技术修复肩袖撕裂的缝合及固定方式研究进展 [J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2016, 36(7): 443-448.
3 朱雪坤, 徐斌, 徐洪港, 等. 肩关节镜下单排缝合技术治疗不同程度肩袖损伤的效果评估 [J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2016, 16(7): 1309-1313.
4 李进选, 张磊, 刘劲松, 等. 关节镜下线桥技术治疗中老年人肩袖损伤 [J]. 中国骨伤, 2015, 28(10): 951-954.
5 黄成龙, 潘界恩, 蔡震海, 等. 关节镜下缝线桥技术治疗老年创伤性肩关节脱位合并肩袖损伤的疗效评价 [J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2016, 22(6): 35-39.
6 傅仰攀, 黄长明, 尹宗生. 全肩关节镜与关节镜辅助治疗肩袖损伤的比较 [J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2016, 24(20): 1839-1843.
7 刘少华, 李宏, 孙亚英, 等. 关节镜下单排与缝线桥技术修复中型肩袖撕裂——临床与核磁共振评价 [J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2017, 36(2): 97-100, 105.
8 郑鸿, 赵甲军, 谭宏昌, 等. 关节镜下缝线桥与传统双排技术修复全层肩袖撕裂的比较 [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2017, 19(9): 806-809.
9 邓威, 谌业帅, 郑欣, 等. 关节镜下双排缝合桥固定技术修复大型肩袖撕裂的临床观察 [J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2017, 10(1): 48-51.
10 张华, 杨俊兴, 李杰. 肩关节镜下单排缝合与双排缝合治疗肩袖损伤的比较研究 [J]. 世界中医药, 2017 (a01): 453-453.
11 田谦. 关节镜下缝线桥与双排锚钉修复肩袖撕裂的疗效观察 [J]. 现代仪器与医疗, 2017, 23(2): 113-115.
12 胡培兴, 李瑾. 关节镜下缝线桥技术治疗老年肩袖损伤合并创伤性肩关节脱位的疗效分析 [J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2017, 22(2): 327-329.
13 潘界恩, 黄成龙, 蔡震海, 等. 关节镜下改良压配式双排缝合技术治疗肩袖大型撕裂早期疗效分析 [J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2017, 23(2): 49-52.
14 熊湘彦. 关节镜缝合桥技术结合肱骨大结节钻孔治疗老年退变性肩袖损伤 [J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2018 (5): 166-167.
15 赵泽旭. 关节镜下线桥缝合术治疗老年肩袖损伤的疗效研究 [J]. 基层医学论坛, 2018 (5): 614-615.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵晨,商培洋,车凌宾,等.锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折合并肩袖撕裂的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):22.
[2]吴斗,郝海虎,朱剑,等.老年髋部骨折术后谵妄的危险因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):34.
[3]高文双,曹建业,吴卫卫,等.墙壁拉力器训练对老年下腰背痛的疗效研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):39.
[4]姬晨妮,陈伟,朱燕宾,等.京津唐地区1 583例老年股骨转子间骨折流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):45.
[5]李石伦,鞠林林,陈伟,等.老年脊柱骨折的流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(01):50.
[6]杨延江 董天华 杜晨光 杨宗酉 陈伟 吕红芝 刘磊 孙家元 王海立 殷兵  刘勃 刘松 张英泽.2008 年至2012 年河北医科大学第三医院 老年踝关节损伤的流行病学研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2015,(02):35.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02 .007]
 Yang Yanjiang,Dong Tianhua,Du Chenguang,et al.Epidemiological analysis of elderly ankle injury in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2008 through 2012[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2015,(06):35.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2015.02 .007]
[7]吕厚辰,唐佩福.老年髋部骨折患者死亡风险评价[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(02):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.009]
 Lyu Houchen,Tang Peifu..Advancement of mortality prediction of aged hip fracture patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(06):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.02.009]
[8]高延征,张广泉,邢帅,等.经皮椎体成形术与经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗老年 Kümmell 病的对比研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):136.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.002]
 Gao Yanzheng,Zhang Guangquan,Xing Shuai,et al.Comparative analysis of percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplastyon in the treatment of the elderly with Kümmell disease[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(06):136.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.002]
[9]于沂阳,刘勃,陈伟,等.2008—2012 年河北医科大学第三医院老年骨折流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):172.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.009]
 Yu Yiyang,Liu Bo,Chen Wei,et al.Epidemiological analysis of geratic fractures in the Third Affiliated Hospital to Hebei Medical University from 2008 to 2012[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(06):172.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.009]
[10]李玉龙,翁习生,董玉雷.老年全膝关节置换术围手术期并发症影响因素的研究进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(03):177.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.010]
 Li Yulong,Weng Xisheng,Dong Yulei.Research progress of influence factors concerning perioperative complications of total knee arthroplasty in aged patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(06):177.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.03.010]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-11