[1]周孝乾,田智勇,陈洪强,等.比基尼入路切开复位PFNA与闭合空心钉治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2020,(05):251-256.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.002]
　Zhou Xiaoqian,Tian Zhiyong,Chen Hongqiang,et al.Comparative Studies on the Use of PFNA associated with open reduction and cannulated screws with closed reduction in femoral neck fractures in young adults[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2020,(05):251-256.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.002]
点击复制

比基尼入路切开复位PFNA与闭合空心钉治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较()
分享到：

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2020年05期
页码:
251-256
栏目:
股骨骨折
出版日期:
2020-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative Studies on the Use of PFNA associated with open reduction and cannulated screws with closed reduction in femoral neck fractures in young adults
作者:
周孝乾; 田智勇; 陈洪强; 鄢承元; 叶赟; 周翔; 周军
550002 贵阳市第四人民医院-创伤与关节外科
Author(s):
Zhou Xiaoqian;  Tian Zhiyong;  Chen Hongqiang;  Yan Chengyuan;  Ye Yun;  Zhou Xiang;  Zhou Jun
Department of Trauma and Joint Surgery, the Forth People’s Hospital of Guiyang City, Guiyang 550002, China
关键词:
股骨颈骨折;  股骨近端防旋髓内钉;  比基尼入路;  空心钉
Keywords:
Femoral neck fractures;  Proximal femoral nail antirotation;  Cannulated screws
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨比基尼入路切开复位股骨近端防旋髓内钉（PFNA）与闭合空心钉治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折的临床疗效及可行性。方法 回顾性分析自2016年1月至2019年2月采用比基尼入路切开直视下复位PFNA，必要时植骨术（PFNA组，28例）与采用闭合空心钉（空心钉组，30例）治疗的青壮年股骨颈骨折患者的临床资料，对比分析两组患者的手术情况、下地时间、骨折愈合时间及并发症情况。结果 所有患者均获得随访，平均随访时间为（12±4）个月，随访期间无死亡病例，伤口无感染，PFNA组手术时间、术中出血量、术后1个月VAS评分分别为（45±19）min、（81±36）ml、（1.0±1.5）分，空心钉组分别为（31±13）min、（36±20）ml、（0.8±1.5）分，差异无统计学意义（均P＞0.05），PFNA组下地时间[（1.8±1.3）d]少于空心钉组[（10.2±8.7）d]（P＜0.05），PFNA组骨折愈合时间为（2.8±1.3）个月，1例出现退钉，10个月后取出内固定器，空心钉组为（4.0±1.8）个月，2例出现骨不连，二期行全髋关节置换，1例退钉愈合，余骨折均随访愈合，无股骨头坏死发生。术后1个月Harris评分：PFNA组，优18例，良6例，中3例，差1例，优良率达 85.7%，空心钉组，优14例，良11例，中2例，差3例，优良率达 83.3%。结论 空心钉与PFNA均能有效治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折。空心钉组不能早期下地负重活动，股骨头坏死率高；PFNA组骨折愈合率高，能早期下地活动，骨折卧床并发症减少，符合加速康复外科理念，是治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折的有效治疗方法。
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the clinical results of conferring PFNA with open reduction and cannulated screws with closed reduction in femoral neck fracture in young adults. Methods To analyze the admitted young patients that consist of 28 cases open reduction and 30 cases closed reduction from January 2016 to February 2019 in our hospital retrospectively. The operation condition, the time of the down ground, the time of fracture healing and the complications of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results No infection and dead patients were found in the series of study. There was no significant difference between the PFNA group and the screw group in the time and the bleeding during the operation (P>0.05), while there was significant difference when come to the weight bearing time (P<0.05). The mean time of union was (2.8±1.3) months in the PFNA group, however, one case of blade depinning was found and then removed the fixation 10 months postoperatively. Contrastively, the average union time of Screw group was (4.0±1.8) months, two cases of nonunion had been underwent the THA revision. No femoral head avascular necrosis was found in both group. Conclusions Both?canulated screw?and PFNA can effectively treat femoral neck fracture in young adults. The cannulated screw group should not be used for early weight bearing and the incidence of femoral head necrosis in this group is more higher than PFNA group; PFNA group patients not only have more higher incidence of bone union and more early full weight bearing time but also have lower incidence of fracture complications, which is fit for the ERAS concept and is a effectively treatment for femoral neck fracture in young adults.

相似文献/References:

[1]黄晓文,公茂琪,查晔军,等.早期快速闭合复位空心钉内固定治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的临床研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):4.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.002]
　Huang Xiaowen,Gong Maoqi,Zha Yejun,et al.Clinical results of early and rapid close reduction with internal fixation cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):4.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.002]
[2]侯建伟,谢仁国,李玉前,等.加长型 PFNA-Ⅱ和DHS治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨转子下骨折的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):22.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.005]
　Hou Jianwei,Xie Renguo,Li Yuqian,et al.Clinical effective analysis of lengthened PFNA- II fixation and dynamic hip screw for senile osteoporotic subtrochanteric fractures[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):22.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.005]
[3]李涛,王英振,李玉龙,等.骨水泥与非骨水泥半髋关节置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折安全性的 Meta分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.008]
　Li Tao,Wang Yingzhen,Li Yulong,et al.Safety of cement and cementless hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta- analysis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.008]
[4]李佳,刘勃,董天华,等.2010-2011年我国西南地区 11所医院 60岁以上股骨颈骨折患者的流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):116.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.010]
　Li Jia,Liu Bo,Dong Tianhua,et al.Epidemiological analysis of femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years in Southwest China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):116.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.010]
[5]贾建波,禹宝庆,吴良浩,等.传统后路与微创 SuperPath入路的半髋置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
　Jia Jianbo,Yu Baoqing,Wu Lianghao,et al.Hip hemiarthroplasty for senile femoral neck fractures: minimally invasive SuperPath approach versus traditional posterior approach[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
[6]董天华,李石伦,于沂阳,等.中国南方和北方地区2010-2011年60岁以上人群股骨颈骨折流行病学对比[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(05):310.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.012]
　Dong Tianhua,Li Shilun,Yu Yiyang,et al.Epidemiological investigation of geriatric femoral neck fractures in south and north areas of China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):310.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.012]
[7]李佳,刘勃,刘松,等.中国中西部地区2010至2011年60岁以上股骨颈骨折流行病学对比[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(01):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.009]
　Li Jia,Liu Bo,Liu Song,et al.Epidemiological analysis of femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years between middle and west areas of China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(05):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.009]
[8]范忠诚,曹亮,张寿,等.不同氨甲环酸应用方法对老年股骨头置换术引流量的影响[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(03):137.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.003]
　Fan Zhongcheng,Cao Liang,Zhang Shou,et al.Effect of tranexamic acid drainage method for elderly femoral head replacement[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(05):137.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.003]
[9]王小波,李雪飞,白晓彬.股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的临床疗效观察[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(03):158.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.007]
　Wang Xiaobo,Li Xuefei,Bai Xiaobin.Clinical observation of proximal femoral nail anti rotation intramedullary nail (PFNA) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(05):158.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.007]
[10]王沈栋,佘昶,董启榕.闭合复位空心螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折后股骨头坏死的影响因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2019,(05):284.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.05.008]
　Wang Shendong,She Chang,Dong Qirong.Analysis of influencing factors related to femoral head necrosis after closed reduction and internal fixation with hollow screws[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2019,(05):284.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.05.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
贵阳市卫生健康局科学技术计划项目{【2018】筑卫计科技合同字第011号}
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-10-10