[1]黄晓文,公茂琪,查晔军,等.早期快速闭合复位空心钉内固定治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的临床研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):4-10.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.002]
　Huang Xiaowen,Gong Maoqi,Zha Yejun,et al.Clinical results of early and rapid close reduction with internal fixation cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(01):4-10.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.002]
点击复制

早期快速闭合复位空心钉内固定治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的临床研究()
分享到：

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2017年01期
页码:
4-10
栏目:
股骨骨折
出版日期:
2017-02-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical results of early and rapid close reduction with internal fixation cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients
作者:
黄晓文 1; 公茂琪 2; 查晔军 2; 蒋协远 2
210029 南京，江苏省人民医院，南京医科大学第一附属医院骨科 1；100035 北京积水潭医院创伤骨科 2
Author(s):
Huang Xiaowen1;  Gong Maoqi2;  Zha Yejun2;  Jiang Xieyuan2
1Department of Orthopedics, Jiangsu Province Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029,China; 2Department of Orthopedics Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China
关键词:
股骨颈骨折;  骨螺钉;  骨折固定术; 内;  老年人
Keywords:
Femoral neck fractures;  Bone screws;  Fracture fixation;  internal;  Aged
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨内科和麻醉科多学科协作下早期快速（48 h内）闭合复位空心钉内固定治疗伴有内科合并症的高龄（＞75岁）股骨颈骨折患者的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析北京积水潭医院 2014年 1月至 2014年 6月收治的符合纳入排除标准的高龄股骨颈骨折患者 48 例。其中 26 例拟行早期快速（48 h内）闭合复位空心钉内固定手术（早期快速手术组），22例拟行闭合复位空心钉内固定手术（常规手术组，7例因准备期间内科基础疾病加重行保守治疗）。比较两组患者的术前等待时间、手术率、术中出血量、围手术期输血量、手术时间、术后生存率、骨折愈合率、住院时间、住院费用及日常生活功能恢复量表（FRS）评分。结果 早期快速手术组无失访，随访率 100%。常规手术组 4例死亡，随访率 81.8%。随访时间为 12～18个月。组间手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合率比较差异无统计学意义。与常规手术组相比，早期快速手术组患者的住院时间、术前等待时间较短，手术率及 1年生存率较高，医疗费用较低，差异均有统计学意义（t=-9.412，P＜0.001；t=-17.531，P＜0.001；c2=9.685，P＜0.05；c2=5.157， P＜0.05；t=-2.203，P＜0.05）；骨折前两组患者的 FRS评分无统计学差异，治疗后早期快速手术组高于常规手术组，差异具有统计学意义（t=2.225，P＜0.05）。结论 早期快速（48 h内）闭合复位空心钉内固定治疗合并内科基础疾病的高龄（＞75岁）股骨颈骨折患者可缩短住院及待术时间、降低住院费用、提高患者生存率并有效促进髋关节功能恢复。
Abstract:
Objective To observe and investigate the clinical effects of early (within 48 hours) and rapid close reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients (>75 years) with multiple chronic systemic diseases. Methods A retrospective study were performed in 48 eligible femoral neck fractures (over 75 years old) with multiple chronic systemic diseases in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2014 to June 2014. Twenty-eight patients underwent cannulated screws internal fixation within 48 h were included into early and rapid treatment group, the rest 22 patients were included in the routine treatment group (normal cannulated screws internal fixation), among them, 7 patients took conservative treatment considering the deterioration of heart and lung. The preoperative waiting time, surgical rate, blood loss, perioperative transfusion, surgical time, postoperative survival incidence, fracture healing rate, hospital stay, medical costs and functional recovery scale were followed up periodically and compared between two groups. Results All patients received successful follow-up in early and rapid treatment group (100%), 4 patients were died and patient retention was 81.8%. Others followed-up for 12 to 18 months. Both group had similar operation time, blood loss and healing rate of femoral neck fractures, no statistically significant differences were observed. Early and rapid treatment group presented shorter hospitalization stay, shorter preoperation waiting time, higher surgical rate, higher one- year survival rate, lower medical costs than routine treatment group, differences were statistically significant (t=- 9.413, P<0.001; t=- 17.531, P<0.001; c2=9.685, P<0.05; c2=5.157, P<0.05; t=- 2.203, P<0.05). Meanwhile early and rapid treatment group showed higher FRS score than routine treatment group, differences were statistically significant (t=2.225, P<0.05), even though the base line of FRS had no significant difference between two groups. Conclusion Early and rapid close reduction with cannulated screws internal fixation within 48 hours can achieve better clinical results in the treatment of elderly femoral neck fractures (>75 years)with multiple chronic systemic diseases, patients had shorter hospitalization stay, better hip joint function (FRS), less medical costs and better survival rate, this method especially suit elderly patients (>75 years) associated with multiple chronic systemic diseases.

相似文献/References:

[1]李涛,王英振,李玉龙,等.骨水泥与非骨水泥半髋关节置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折安全性的 Meta分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.008]
　Li Tao,Wang Yingzhen,Li Yulong,et al.Safety of cement and cementless hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta- analysis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(01):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.008]
[2]李佳,刘勃,董天华,等.2010-2011年我国西南地区 11所医院 60岁以上股骨颈骨折患者的流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):116.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.010]
　Li Jia,Liu Bo,Dong Tianhua,et al.Epidemiological analysis of femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years in Southwest China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(01):116.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.010]
[3]贾建波,禹宝庆,吴良浩,等.传统后路与微创 SuperPath入路的半髋置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
　Jia Jianbo,Yu Baoqing,Wu Lianghao,et al.Hip hemiarthroplasty for senile femoral neck fractures: minimally invasive SuperPath approach versus traditional posterior approach[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(01):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
[4]董天华,李石伦,于沂阳,等.中国南方和北方地区2010-2011年60岁以上人群股骨颈骨折流行病学对比[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(05):310.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.012]
　Dong Tianhua,Li Shilun,Yu Yiyang,et al.Epidemiological investigation of geriatric femoral neck fractures in south and north areas of China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(01):310.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.012]
[5]李佳,刘勃,刘松,等.中国中西部地区2010至2011年60岁以上股骨颈骨折流行病学对比[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(01):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.009]
　Li Jia,Liu Bo,Liu Song,et al.Epidemiological analysis of femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years between middle and west areas of China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(01):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.009]
[6]范忠诚,曹亮,张寿,等.不同氨甲环酸应用方法对老年股骨头置换术引流量的影响[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(03):137.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.003]
　Fan Zhongcheng,Cao Liang,Zhang Shou,et al.Effect of tranexamic acid drainage method for elderly femoral head replacement[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(01):137.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.003]
[7]王沈栋,佘昶,董启榕.闭合复位空心螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折后股骨头坏死的影响因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2019,(05):284.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.05.008]
　Wang Shendong,She Chang,Dong Qirong.Analysis of influencing factors related to femoral head necrosis after closed reduction and internal fixation with hollow screws[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2019,(01):284.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.05.008]
[8]王金良,徐行,张黎.制槽法取出滑丝螺钉的疗效研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2019,(06):342.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.06.008]
　Wang Jinliang,Xu Hang,Zhang Li.Study on the effect of removing the slide wire screw by the grooved method[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2019,(01):342.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.06.008]
[9]周孝乾,田智勇,陈洪强,等.比基尼入路切开复位PFNA与闭合空心钉治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2020,(05):251.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.002]
　Zhou Xiaoqian,Tian Zhiyong,Chen Hongqiang,et al.Comparative Studies on the Use of PFNA associated with open reduction and cannulated screws with closed reduction in femoral neck fractures in young adults[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2020,(01):251.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.002]
[10]焦力刚,张雷,王卫友.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型人工半髋关节置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折患者的对比研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2020,(05):265.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.004]
　Jiao Ligang,Zhang Lei,Wang Weiyou..A comparative analysis of cemented and non cemented hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2020,(01):265.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.004]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：北京市医管局临床医学发展专项“扬帆计划”项目（XMLX201307）
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-04-01