[1]焦力刚,张雷,王卫友.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型人工半髋关节置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折患者的对比研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2020,(05):265-270.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.004]
　Jiao Ligang,Zhang Lei,Wang Weiyou..A comparative analysis of cemented and non cemented hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2020,(05):265-270.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.004]
点击复制

骨水泥型与非骨水泥型人工半髋关节置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折患者的对比研究()
分享到：

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2020年05期
页码:
265-270
栏目:
股骨骨折
出版日期:
2020-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
A comparative analysis of cemented and non cemented hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly
作者:
焦力刚1; 张雷1; 王卫友2
050600 石家庄，行唐县人民医院骨科1；063000 唐山市协和医院骨科2
Author(s):
Jiao Ligang1;  Zhang Lei1;  Wang Weiyou2.
Department of Orthopedics, Xingtang County People’s Hospital1, Shijiazhuang 050600, China; 2Department of Orthopedics, Tangshan Union Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China
关键词:
股骨颈骨折;  半髋关节置换术;  骨水泥型;  人工半髋关节;  并发症发生率
Keywords:
Femoral neck fractures;  Hemiarthroplasty;  Cement type;  Artificial hemi hip joint;  Complication rate
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 对比骨水泥型与非骨水泥非骨水泥型人工半髋关节置换术在高龄股骨颈骨折患者中的治疗效果。方法 前瞻性收集2014年1月至2018年12月期间行唐县人民医院收治的112例高龄股骨颈骨折患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法将患者分为骨水泥组、非骨水泥组，每组各56例。骨水泥组患者给予骨水泥型人工半髋置换手术治疗，男26例，女30例，年龄（72±4）岁。非骨水泥组给予非骨水泥人工半髋关节置换术治疗，男31例，女25例，年龄（73±4）岁。对比两组患者围术期相关指标、手术效果、并发症发生率，并对两组患者术后进行为期3年的随访观察，对患者在随访期间的Harris髋关节功能评分、不良事件发生率等进行统计对比。结果 112例患者获得完整随访，随访时间（36±5）个月。两组患者手术时间、术中失血量、引流量等差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），而骨水泥组患者的住院时间[（14±3）d]、开始负重时间[（41±9）d]均低于非骨水泥组[（17±3）d、（46±10）d]（t=4.353，2.856，P＜0.05）。骨水泥组手术优良率为87.50%（49/56），高于非骨水泥组71.43%（40/56）（c2=4.432，P＜0.05）。骨水泥组术后并发症发生率为7.14%（4/56），低于非骨水泥组的21.43%（12/56）（c2=4.667，P＜0.05）。骨水泥组患者的Harris评分在术后6个月[（82±14）分]、12个月[（86±8）分]、24个月[（91±7）分]、36个月[（95±4）分]均优于非骨水泥组[（76±11、81±9、87±8、91±6）分]。骨水泥组不良事件发生率为8.93%（5/56），低于非骨水泥组的23.21%（13/56）（c2=4.236，P＜0.05）。结论 相较于非骨水泥型人工半髋关节，骨水泥型人工半髋关节置换术对于高龄股骨颈骨折患者的手术效果更好，术后关节功能恢复好，值得临床推荐。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effect of cemented and non-cemented non-cemented artificial hip arthroplasty in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture. Methods A prospective collection of 112 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures admitted to Xingtang County People’s Hospital from January 2014 to December 2018 were done. The patients were divided into cemented and non-cemented groups by a random number table. 56 cases in each group. Patients in the cement group were treated with cement-type artificial hemi hip replacement. There were 26 males and 30 females, aged (72±4) years. The non-cemented group was treated with non-cemented artificial hip arthroplasty. There were 31 males and 25 females, aged (73±4) years old. The perioperative indicators, surgical effects, and complication rates of the two groups of patients were compared, and the two groups were followed up for 3 years after the operation. The Harris hip function score and the incidence of adverse events during the follow-up period were evaluated and statistical analyzed. Results 112 patients were followed up completely, and the follow-up time was (36±5) months. There was no statistically significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, drainage volume, etc. between the two groups (P>0.05), while the hospitalization time of the bone cement group was (14±3) days and the time to start weight bearing (41±9) days were both lower than the non-cemented group [(17±3)d, (46±10)d, t=4.353, 2.856, P<0.05]. The excellent and good rate of surgery in the cement group was 87.50% (49/56), which was higher than the non-cement group [71.43% (40/56), c2=4.432, P<0.05]. The postoperative complication rate in the cement group was 7.14% (4/56), which was lower than the non-cement group [21.43% (12/56), c2=4.667, P<0.05]. Harris scores of patients in the bone cement group were better than the cement group (76±11, 81±9, 87±8, 91±6) at 6 months (82±14), 12 months (86±8), 24 months (91±7) and 36 months (95±4) after surgery. The incidence of adverse events in the cement group was 8.93% (5/56), which was lower than that of the non-cement group [23.21% (13/56), c2=4.236, P<0.05]. Conclusion Compared with non-cemented artificial hip joints, cemented artificial hip joint replacements have better surgical results for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures and good postoperative joint function recovery, which is worthy of clinical recommendation.

相似文献/References:

[1]黄晓文,公茂琪,查晔军,等.早期快速闭合复位空心钉内固定治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的临床研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):4.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.002]
　Huang Xiaowen,Gong Maoqi,Zha Yejun,et al.Clinical results of early and rapid close reduction with internal fixation cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):4.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.002]
[2]李涛,王英振,李玉龙,等.骨水泥与非骨水泥半髋关节置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折安全性的 Meta分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.008]
　Li Tao,Wang Yingzhen,Li Yulong,et al.Safety of cement and cementless hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta- analysis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.008]
[3]李佳,刘勃,董天华,等.2010-2011年我国西南地区 11所医院 60岁以上股骨颈骨折患者的流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):116.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.010]
　Li Jia,Liu Bo,Dong Tianhua,et al.Epidemiological analysis of femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years in Southwest China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):116.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.010]
[4]贾建波,禹宝庆,吴良浩,等.传统后路与微创 SuperPath入路的半髋置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
　Jia Jianbo,Yu Baoqing,Wu Lianghao,et al.Hip hemiarthroplasty for senile femoral neck fractures: minimally invasive SuperPath approach versus traditional posterior approach[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
[5]董天华,李石伦,于沂阳,等.中国南方和北方地区2010-2011年60岁以上人群股骨颈骨折流行病学对比[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(05):310.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.012]
　Dong Tianhua,Li Shilun,Yu Yiyang,et al.Epidemiological investigation of geriatric femoral neck fractures in south and north areas of China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(05):310.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.012]
[6]李佳,刘勃,刘松,等.中国中西部地区2010至2011年60岁以上股骨颈骨折流行病学对比[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(01):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.009]
　Li Jia,Liu Bo,Liu Song,et al.Epidemiological analysis of femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years between middle and west areas of China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(05):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.009]
[7]范忠诚,曹亮,张寿,等.不同氨甲环酸应用方法对老年股骨头置换术引流量的影响[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(03):137.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.003]
　Fan Zhongcheng,Cao Liang,Zhang Shou,et al.Effect of tranexamic acid drainage method for elderly femoral head replacement[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(05):137.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.003]
[8]王沈栋,佘昶,董启榕.闭合复位空心螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折后股骨头坏死的影响因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2019,(05):284.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.05.008]
　Wang Shendong,She Chang,Dong Qirong.Analysis of influencing factors related to femoral head necrosis after closed reduction and internal fixation with hollow screws[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2019,(05):284.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.05.008]
[9]周孝乾,田智勇,陈洪强,等.比基尼入路切开复位PFNA与闭合空心钉治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2020,(05):251.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.002]
　Zhou Xiaoqian,Tian Zhiyong,Chen Hongqiang,et al.Comparative Studies on the Use of PFNA associated with open reduction and cannulated screws with closed reduction in femoral neck fractures in young adults[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2020,(05):251.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.002]
[10]杜兵,马腾,路遥,等.新型股骨颈内固定系统与3枚空心钉加内侧钢板固定青壮年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的有限元分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2021,(06):333.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.06.003]
　Du Bing,Ma Teng,et al.Finite Element Analysis of the new femoral neck internal fixationsystem and three hollow screws plus medial plate fixation for Pauwels III femoral neck fractures in young adults[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2021,(05):333.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.06.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
河北省卫生厅课题项目（20191629）
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-10-10