[1]张学斌,雷凯,任荣,等.高海拔地区股骨颈骨折空心螺钉斜三角与倒三角构型的三维有限元对比研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2022,(04):205-210.[doi:DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2022.04.003]
 Zhang Xuebin,Lei Kai,Ren Rong,et al.Oblique triangle and inverted triangle configurations of cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures in high altitude population: a three-dimensional finite element comparative study[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2022,(04):205-210.[doi:DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2022.04.003]
点击复制

高海拔地区股骨颈骨折空心螺钉斜三角与倒三角构型的三维有限元对比研究()
分享到:

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2022年04期
页码:
205-210
栏目:
股骨骨折
出版日期:
2022-08-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Oblique triangle and inverted triangle configurations of cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures in high altitude population: a three-dimensional finite element comparative study
作者:
张学斌雷凯任荣李得春王小平白景棠齐园园王哲刘熹
西宁 810000,青海大学附属医院骨科
Author(s):
Zhang Xuebin Lei Kai Ren Rong Li Dechun Wang Xiaoping Bai Jingtang Qi Yuanyuan Wang Zhe Liu Xi.
Department of Orthopedics, Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining 810000, Qinghai, China
关键词:
股骨颈骨折 空心螺钉 斜三角 倒三角 三维有限元
Keywords:
Femoral neck fracture Cannulated screw Oblique triangle Inverted triangle Three-dimensional finite element
DOI:
DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2022.04.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 应用三维有限元技术对比分析高海拔地区股骨颈骨折空心螺钉两种构型的稳定性。方法 获取1例正常股骨颈的CT图像,使用3-matic Research 13.0制备股骨颈骨折模型,分别建立了股骨颈骨折空心螺钉斜三角构型和倒三角构型的有限元模型。对有限元模型分别进行500 N,1 000 N,1 500 N,2 100 N的载荷,观察记录股骨及空心螺钉应力和位移变化情况。结果 相同载荷下,斜三角构型的各螺钉最大位移、最大VonMises应力均小于倒三角构型的螺钉;斜三角构型股骨头应力集中的范围要小于倒三角构型;两种模型中斜三角构型的股骨整体最大位移均小于倒三角构型;斜三角构型中股骨整体最大Von Mises应力高于倒三角构型。结论 相同载荷下,斜三角构型更符合股骨颈正常解剖特点,各个螺钉所受的应力分布更为合理,对骨折的固定更为坚强,更能有效避免术后内固定断裂失败、内固定切出等并发症的发生。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the stability of two types of cannulated screws for femoral neck fracture in high altitude area with three-dimensional finite element technique. Methods CT images of 1 normal femoral neck were obtained and the femoral neck fracture model was prepared by 3-Matic Research 13.0.The finite element models of oblique triangle and inverted triangle of hollow screw were established respectively. The finite element models were loaded at 500 N,1 000 N, 1 500 N and 2 100 N, respectively. The Von Mises peak stress and displacement of cannulated screws and the stress distribution of femoral head were observed and recorded. Results Under the same load, the maximum displacement and the maximum VonMises stress of the screw with oblique triangle configuration is smaller than that of the screw with inverted triangle configuration. The stress concentration range of femoral head in oblique triangle configuration was smaller than that in inverted triangle configuration. The overall maximum displacement of femur in oblique triangle configuration was less than that in inverted triangle configuration. The maximum VonMises stress of femur in oblique triangle was higher than that in inverted triangle. Conclusions Under the same load, compared with the traditional inverted triangle configuration, the oblique triangle configuration is more consistent with the normal anatomical characteristics of femoral neck, the stress distribution of each screw is more reasonable, the fixation of fracture is stronger, and it can effectively avoid the occurrence of complications such as fracture failure and internal fixation cutting out.

相似文献/References:

[1]黄晓文,公茂琪,查晔军,等.早期快速闭合复位空心钉内固定治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的临床研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):4.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.002]
 Huang Xiaowen,Gong Maoqi,Zha Yejun,et al.Clinical results of early and rapid close reduction with internal fixation cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(04):4.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.002]
[2]李涛,王英振,李玉龙,等.骨水泥与非骨水泥半髋关节置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折安全性的 Meta分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.008]
 Li Tao,Wang Yingzhen,Li Yulong,et al.Safety of cement and cementless hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta- analysis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(04):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.008]
[3]李佳,刘勃,董天华,等.2010-2011年我国西南地区 11所医院 60岁以上股骨颈骨折患者的流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):116.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.010]
 Li Jia,Liu Bo,Dong Tianhua,et al.Epidemiological analysis of femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years in Southwest China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(04):116.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.010]
[4]贾建波,禹宝庆,吴良浩,等.传统后路与微创 SuperPath入路的半髋置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
 Jia Jianbo,Yu Baoqing,Wu Lianghao,et al.Hip hemiarthroplasty for senile femoral neck fractures: minimally invasive SuperPath approach versus traditional posterior approach[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(04):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
[5]董天华,李石伦,于沂阳,等.中国南方和北方地区2010-2011年60岁以上人群股骨颈骨折流行病学对比[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(05):310.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.012]
 Dong Tianhua,Li Shilun,Yu Yiyang,et al.Epidemiological investigation of geriatric femoral neck fractures in south and north areas of China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(04):310.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.012]
[6]李佳,刘勃,刘松,等.中国中西部地区2010至2011年60岁以上股骨颈骨折流行病学对比[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(01):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.009]
 Li Jia,Liu Bo,Liu Song,et al.Epidemiological analysis of femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years between middle and west areas of China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(04):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.009]
[7]范忠诚,曹亮,张寿,等.不同氨甲环酸应用方法对老年股骨头置换术引流量的影响[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(03):137.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.003]
 Fan Zhongcheng,Cao Liang,Zhang Shou,et al.Effect of tranexamic acid drainage method for elderly femoral head replacement[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(04):137.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.003]
[8]吴建国 尹律平 蔡玉钦. 应用空心螺钉治疗老年股骨颈骨折的疗效[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2019,(04):196.[doi:DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.04.003]
 Wu jianguo,Yin lyuping,Cai yuqin.. The efficacy comparative analysis of cannulated screws for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2019,(04):196.[doi:DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.04.003]
[9]王沈栋,佘昶,董启榕.闭合复位空心螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折后股骨头坏死的影响因素分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2019,(05):284.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.05.008]
 Wang Shendong,She Chang,Dong Qirong.Analysis of influencing factors related to femoral head necrosis after closed reduction and internal fixation with hollow screws[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2019,(04):284.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.05.008]
[10]周孝乾,田智勇,陈洪强,等.比基尼入路切开复位PFNA与闭合空心钉治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2020,(05):251.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.002]
 Zhou Xiaoqian,Tian Zhiyong,Chen Hongqiang,et al.Comparative Studies on the Use of PFNA associated with open reduction and cannulated screws with closed reduction in femoral neck fractures in young adults[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2020,(04):251.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2020.05.002]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:青海省科学技术厅应用基础研究项目(2019-ZJ-7095)
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-09-29