[1]高磊,瞿玉兴,高益,等.功率自行车对老年髋关节置换患者术后早期功能恢复的疗效分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2019,(06):312-316.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.06.002]
 Gao Lei,Qu Yuxing,Gao Yi,et al.Efficacy analysis of postoperative cycle ergometer program for elderly total hip arthroplasty patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2019,(06):312-316.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.06.002]
点击复制

功率自行车对老年髋关节置换患者术后早期功能恢复的疗效分析()
分享到:

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2019年06期
页码:
312-316
栏目:
关节
出版日期:
2019-12-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Efficacy analysis of postoperative cycle ergometer program for elderly total hip arthroplasty patients
作者:
高磊瞿玉兴高益沈鹏飞王斌郑冲徐建达谢子康
213000 南京中医药大学附属常州市中医院骨科
Author(s):
Gao Lei Qu Yuxing Gao Yi Shen Pengfei Wang Bin Zheng Chong Xu Jianda Xie Zikang
Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing university of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzhou 21300, China
关键词:
功率自行车 关节成形术置换 康复
Keywords:
Bicycle exercise Hip Joint replacement Rehabilitation
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.06.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨早期下肢功率自行车应用对老年髋关节置换患者功能恢复的影响。方法 前瞻性收集南京中医药大学附属常州市中医院骨科150例行髋关节置换术后两周的患者,根据纳入标准,纳入87例患者,随机分为常规组及常规+自行车训练组。常规训练组患者在康复治疗师指导下进行常规康复训练,常规+自行车训练组患者在常规康复训练基础上进行下肢功率自行车训练。两组患者都于术后8 w、4个月分别采用Harris评分及WOMAC量表对髋关节及全身健康状况进行评定。结果 两组患者在治疗过程中均未出现严重并发症。WOMAC评分:术后8 w常规+自行车训练组患者髋关节僵硬程度[(26±20)分]较对照组[(26±23)分]改善明显,差异有统计学意义(t=9.765,P<0.05),功能及疼痛评分差异均无统计学意义。术后4个月WOMAC各项评分提示,常规+自行车训练组患者功能[(22±18)分]优于常规训练组[(25±19)分],差异具有统计学意义(t=5.434,P<0.05)。Harris评分:术后8 w及4个月常规+自行车训练组[(82±6)分、(88±12)分]高于同期常规康复训练组[(86±6)分、(82±6)分],差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 老年髋关节置换患者术后早期进行常规康复训练及功率自行车训练,能显著改善患者疼痛及促进患者术后髋关节功能恢复。
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the effect of cycle ergometer program for elderly total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. Methods Prospective collected 150 patients underwent hip arthroplasty in the Department of Orthopaedics, Changzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. Eighty-seven older patients who had received primary hip replacement were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 treatment groups randomly. Conventional group performed only conventional exercises, and experimental group performed cycle ergometer and conventionalexercises. Patients were evaluated by Hip function and health-related quality of life were evaluated by Harris Hip Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at 8 weeks and 4months after surgery. Results There were no serious complications in the treatment of the two groups. WOMAC score: The degree of hip stiffness was (26±20) in experimental group at postoperative 8 weeks, which was significantly improved than that in the regulartraining group (26±23), results was statistically significant (t=9.765, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in functional and pain scores .The WOMAC scores at 4months postoperatively showed that the recovery degree of the experimental group (22±18) was significantly improved compared with the regular training group (25±19), and the difference was statistically significant(t=5.434, P<0.05). Harris score at 8 weeks and 4 months of the experimental group (82±6, 88±12) was higher than the regular training group (86±6, 82±6), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The rehabilitation including cycle ergometer can improve elderly patients’ pain and function after the THA.

参考文献/References:

1 Bagarié I, Sarac H, Borovac JA, et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty: health related quality of life outcomes [J]. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(3): 495-501.
2 Rampazo MK, D’Elboux MJ. The influence of sociodemographic, clinical and functional variables on the quality of life of elderly people with total hip arthroplasty [J]. Rev Bras Fisioter, 2010, 14(3): 244-251.
3 Wood GC, Mclauchlan GJ. Outcome assessment in the elderly after total hip arthroplasty [J]. J Arthroplasty, 2006, 21(3): 398-404.
4 Ritterman S, Rubin LE. Rehabilitation for total joint arthroplasty [J]. R I Med J, 2013, 96(5): 19-22.
5 Brown GA. AAOS clinical practice guideline of osteoarthritis of the knee: evidence-based guideline, 2nd edition [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2013, 21(9): 577-579.
6 Schwachmeyer V, Damm P, Bender A, et al. In vivo hip joint loading during post-operative physiotherapeutic exercises [J]. 2013, 8(10): e77807.
7 Soderman P. On the validity of the results from the Swedish national total hip arthroplasty register [J]. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, 2000, 71(296): 1-33.
8 Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fracture: treatment by mold arthroplasty, an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation [J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 1969, 51(4): 737-755.
9 Peter WF, Nelissen RG, Vliet Vlieland TP. Guideline recommendations for post-acute postoperative physiotherapy in total hip and knee arthroplasty: are they used in daily clinical practice [J]. Musculoskeletal Care, 2014, 12(3): 125-131.
10 Geissler A, Scheller-Kreinsen D, Quentin W, et al. Do diagnosis-related groups appropriately explain variations in costs and length of stay of hip replacement [J]. Health Econ, 2012, 21 Suppl2: 103-115.
11 陈晟, 戴闽, 帅浪, 等. 早期运动治疗对全髋关节置换术后髋关节功能的影响 [J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2009, 31(6): 411-413.
12 Judd DL, Dennis DA, Thomas AC, et al. Muscle strength and functional recovery during the first year after THA [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(2): 654-664.
13 Di Monaco M, Vallero F, Tappero R, et al. Rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of controlled trials on physical exercise programs [J]. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 2009, 45(3): 303-317.
14 毕胜, 燕铁斌, 王宁华, 等. 运动控制原理与实践 [M]. 第3版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2009: 4-16.
15 周开颜, 王莉, 喻宏. 人工全髋关节置换围手术期的教育康复 [J]. 中国康复, 2003, 18(1): 63.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐明 付志厚 孙海宁 曲新涛 于秀淳.腓骨近端截骨与单髁关节置换治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨关节炎的疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(01):26.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.006]
 Xu Ming,Fu Zhihou,Sun Haining,et al.Comparison study of proximal fibular osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medialcompartment osteoarthritis of the knee[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(06):26.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.006]
[2]杨朝君 孙智文 田洪涛.腓骨近端截骨术与人工全膝关节置换术治疗内翻型膝关节骨关节炎的短期疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(01):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.008]
 Yang Zhaojun,Sun Zhiwen,Tian Hongtao.Comparison on the short term treatment of varus knee osteoarthritis by proximal fibular osteotomy versus total knee arthroplasty[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(06):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.008]
[3]李雪靖,张雪松,刘思思,等.腓骨近端截骨联合关节镜下清理治疗内翻型膝关节骨关节炎的成本效果分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(04):222.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.006]
 Li Xuejing,Zhang Xuesong,Liu Sisi,et al.Cost-effectiveness analysis of proximal fibular osteotomy combined with arthroscopy debridement for medial compartment knee ostoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(06):222.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.006]
[4]张静,李志锐,唐佩福.老年粗隆间骨折的手术治疗进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(04):250.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.011]
 Li Zhirui,Zhang Jing,Tang Peifu.Progress of surgical treatment for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(06):250.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.011]
[5]李涛,王英振,李玉龙,等.骨水泥与非骨水泥半髋关节置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折安全性的 Meta分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.008]
 Li Tao,Wang Yingzhen,Li Yulong,et al.Safety of cement and cementless hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta- analysis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(06):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.008]
[6]陈佳,李西成.髋部骨折:争议与挑战[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):193.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.001]
 Chen Jia,Li Xicheng.Hip fracture: Controversy and challenge[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(06):193.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.001]
[7]贾建波,禹宝庆,吴良浩,等.传统后路与微创 SuperPath入路的半髋置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
 Jia Jianbo,Yu Baoqing,Wu Lianghao,et al.Hip hemiarthroplasty for senile femoral neck fractures: minimally invasive SuperPath approach versus traditional posterior approach[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(06):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
[8]扈鑫,高石军,董江涛,等.中老年全膝关节置换术后下肢深静脉血栓形成的解剖部位分布特点[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(05):296.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.009]
 Hu Xin,Gao Shijun,Dong Jiangtao,et al.The anatomical distribution of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis of middle-aged, and older patients after total knee arthroplasty[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(06):296.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.009]
[9]姚尧,乔梁,王业贤,等.床旁超声在股骨颈骨折患者围手术期下肢深静脉血栓筛查中的作用[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(02):70.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.02.002]
 Yao Yao,Qiao Liang,Wang Yexian,et al.The clinical value of bedside ultrasound in the screening of perioperative lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(06):70.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.02.002]
[10]楚翔宇,程文俊,王俊文,等.老年股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术围手术期下肢深静脉血栓形成的特点[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(02):75.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.02.003]
 Chu Xiangyu,Cheng Wenjun,Wang Junwen,et al.Features of deep venous thrombosis in aged patients with femoral neck fracture during the perioperative period[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(06):75.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.02.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:江苏省中医药局科技项目(LZ11137)
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-11