[1]董佩龙,唐晓波,王健,等.加速康复外科在人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折中的应用研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2021,(03):170-175.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.03.008]
 Dong Peilong,Tang Xiaobo,Wang Jian,et al.Clinical study of enhanced recovery after surgery in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fracture with artificial femoral head replacement in elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2021,(03):170-175.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.03.008]
点击复制

加速康复外科在人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折中的应用研究()
分享到:

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2021年03期
页码:
170-175
栏目:
康复医学
出版日期:
2021-06-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical study of enhanced recovery after surgery in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fracture with artificial femoral head replacement in elderly patients
作者:
董佩龙唐晓波王健李志云谢淑君
224700 盐城,南通大学附属建湖医院骨科
Author(s):
Dong Peilong Tang Xiaobo Wang Jian Li Zhiyun Xie Shujun
Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Jianhu Hospital of Nantong University, Yancheng 224700, China
关键词:
加速康复外科 关节成形术置换 老年人 前瞻性研究
Keywords:
Enhanced recovery after surgery Arthroplasty replacement hip Aged Prospective study
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2021.03.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 通过临床随机对照研究,探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)在人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折中的应用效果。方法 前瞻性收集2016年02月至2018年02月南通大学附属建湖医院骨科收治的52例符合选择标准的拟定行人工股骨头置换术的老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者。其中26例采用ERAS围手术期方案(试验组),男性12例,女性14例,平均年龄(79.7±3.1)岁,26例采用传统围手术期方案(对照组),男性13例,女性13例,平均年龄(78.8±2.6)岁。比较两组术后2 h 血红蛋白及输血比例、术后住院时间(LOS)、术后并发症、术后24 h、1个月、3个月、12个月疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Harris评分。结果 术后患者均获随访,随访时间12~24个月,平均(18±3)个月。试验组术后24 h血红蛋白[(110.4±13.7)g/L]高于对照组[(100.1±9.0)g/L],试验组术后LOS[(3.6±0.8)d]短于对照组[(4.6±0.8)d],差异均有统计学意义(t=3.204,P=0.002;t=3.749,P=0.001),试验组输血比例及术后并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义。试验组和对照组术前、术后24 h、1个月、3 个月、12个月VAS评分及Harris评分进行重复测量设计的方差分析显示试验组和对照组组间差异有统计学意义,组别与时间点间存在交互作用,各时间点除第一时间点和第五时间点外两组差异均有统计学意义,试验组在各时间点间差异均有统计学意义。结论 ERAS理念干预下,人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折术后失血少、术后住院时间短、并发症发生率低、术后短期疼痛轻,康复快,利于髋关节功能的早期恢复。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fracture with artificial femoral head replacement in elderly patients. Methods From Feburary 2016 to Feburary 2018, 52 patients who underwent the treatment of artificial femoral head replacement with intertrochanteric femoral fracture in elderly patients were randomly divided into two groups: ERAS group (experimental group, n=26, including 12 males and 14 female,with a median age of 79.7±3.1 years) and routine group (control group, n=26, including 13 males and 13 female, with a median age of 78.8±2.6 years). Follow-up assessment included postoperative hemoglobin at 24 hours after operation, blood transfusion ratio, postoperative length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, VAS score and Harris score at 24 hours, 1 month, 3 months and 12 months after operation. Results All the 52 patients were followed up for 12-24 months (18±3 months on average). Postoperative hemoglobin at 24 hours after operation in experimental group [(110.4±13.7) g/L] was significantly higher than that in control group [(100.1±9.0) g/L]. The postoperative LOS in the experimental group [(3.6±0.8) d] was significantly shorter than that in the control group [(4.6±0.8) d]. There were significant differences between the two groups (t=3.204, P=0.002, t=3.749, P=0.001). The blood transfusion ratio and the incidence of complications in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group. There were significant differences between the two groups. The VAS score and Harris score of the experimental group and the control group before and after 24 h, 1 month, 3 months, 12 months of repeated measurement design showed that there were significant differences between the experimental group and the control group. There was interaction between the two groups at different time points. Except for the first time point and the fifth time point, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. There were statistically significant differences in the experimental group at each time point. Conclusion The application of ERAS in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fracture with artificial femoral head replacement in elderly patients can reduce blood loss and the incidence of complications, shorten hospital stay, cause less short-term pain after operation, achieve faster recovery. It is beneficial to the early recovery of hip joint function.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐明 付志厚 孙海宁 曲新涛 于秀淳.腓骨近端截骨与单髁关节置换治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨关节炎的疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(01):26.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.006]
 Xu Ming,Fu Zhihou,Sun Haining,et al.Comparison study of proximal fibular osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medialcompartment osteoarthritis of the knee[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):26.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.006]
[2]杨朝君 孙智文 田洪涛.腓骨近端截骨术与人工全膝关节置换术治疗内翻型膝关节骨关节炎的短期疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(01):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.008]
 Yang Zhaojun,Sun Zhiwen,Tian Hongtao.Comparison on the short term treatment of varus knee osteoarthritis by proximal fibular osteotomy versus total knee arthroplasty[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.008]
[3]李雪靖,张雪松,刘思思,等.腓骨近端截骨联合关节镜下清理治疗内翻型膝关节骨关节炎的成本效果分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(04):222.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.006]
 Li Xuejing,Zhang Xuesong,Liu Sisi,et al.Cost-effectiveness analysis of proximal fibular osteotomy combined with arthroscopy debridement for medial compartment knee ostoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):222.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.006]
[4]张静,李志锐,唐佩福.老年粗隆间骨折的手术治疗进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(04):250.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.011]
 Li Zhirui,Zhang Jing,Tang Peifu.Progress of surgical treatment for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):250.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.011]
[5]李涛,王英振,李玉龙,等.骨水泥与非骨水泥半髋关节置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折安全性的 Meta分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.008]
 Li Tao,Wang Yingzhen,Li Yulong,et al.Safety of cement and cementless hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta- analysis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.008]
[6]陈佳,李西成.髋部骨折:争议与挑战[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):193.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.001]
 Chen Jia,Li Xicheng.Hip fracture: Controversy and challenge[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):193.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.001]
[7]贾建波,禹宝庆,吴良浩,等.传统后路与微创 SuperPath入路的半髋置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
 Jia Jianbo,Yu Baoqing,Wu Lianghao,et al.Hip hemiarthroplasty for senile femoral neck fractures: minimally invasive SuperPath approach versus traditional posterior approach[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
[8]扈鑫,高石军,董江涛,等.中老年全膝关节置换术后下肢深静脉血栓形成的解剖部位分布特点[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(05):296.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.009]
 Hu Xin,Gao Shijun,Dong Jiangtao,et al.The anatomical distribution of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis of middle-aged, and older patients after total knee arthroplasty[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):296.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.009]
[9]姚尧,乔梁,王业贤,等.床旁超声在股骨颈骨折患者围手术期下肢深静脉血栓筛查中的作用[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(02):70.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.02.002]
 Yao Yao,Qiao Liang,Wang Yexian,et al.The clinical value of bedside ultrasound in the screening of perioperative lower extremity deep vein thrombosis in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):70.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.02.002]
[10]楚翔宇,程文俊,王俊文,等.老年股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术围手术期下肢深静脉血栓形成的特点[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(02):75.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.02.003]
 Chu Xiangyu,Cheng Wenjun,Wang Junwen,et al.Features of deep venous thrombosis in aged patients with femoral neck fracture during the perioperative period[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):75.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.02.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:2018年度江苏省第五期“333 工程”科研项目资助计划(BRA2018250);盐城市医学科技发展计划资助项目(YK2017080)
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-06-29