[1]范忠诚,曹亮,张寿,等.不同氨甲环酸应用方法对老年股骨头置换术引流量的影响[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(03):137-140.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.003]
　Fan Zhongcheng,Cao Liang,Zhang Shou,et al.Effect of tranexamic acid drainage method for elderly femoral head replacement[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):137-140.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.003]
点击复制

不同氨甲环酸应用方法对老年股骨头置换术引流量的影响()
分享到：

中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志[ISSN:1674-3911/CN:11-9292/R]

卷:
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
137-140
栏目:
髋关节
出版日期:
2018-05-23

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of tranexamic acid drainage method for elderly femoral head replacement
作者:
范忠诚; 曹亮; 张寿; 王琮仁; 金旭红; 邢势; 吴多庆
570208 中南大学湘雅医学院附属海口医院骨科中心
Author(s):
Fan Zhongcheng;  Cao Liang;  Zhang Shou;  Wang Congren;  Jin Xuhong;  Xing Shi;  Wu Duoqing
Center Department of Orthopedics, Haikou Hospital Affiliated to Xiangya Medical College of Central South University, Haikou 570208, China
关键词:
股骨颈骨折;  关节成形术; 置换; 髋;  止血;  氨甲环酸;  引流量
Keywords:
Femoral neck fractures;  Arthroplasty;  replacement;  hip;  Hemostasis;  Tranexamic acid;  Drainage
DOI:
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.03.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察不同氨甲环酸应用方法对老年股骨颈骨折股骨头置换术后引流量的影响。方法 前瞻性收集中南大学湘雅医学院附属海口医院骨科中心收治的75例行股骨头置换术的股骨颈骨折患者，随机分为A组、B组、C组，三组各25例。A组关闭切口前静脉滴注1%氨甲环酸1 g+关节周围软组织局部注射5%氨甲环酸20 ml+缝合伤口后经引流管推注5%氨甲环酸20 ml浸泡2 h，B组关闭切口前静脉滴注生理盐水100 ml+关节周围软组织局部注射5%氨甲环酸20 ml+缝合伤口后经引流管推注5%氨甲环酸20 ml浸泡2 h，C组关闭切口前静脉滴注生理盐水100 ml+关节周围软组织局部注射生理盐水20 ml+缝合伤口后经引流管推注生理盐水20 ml浸泡2 h。观察术后24 h三组患者伤口引流量，术后48 h血红蛋白变化值。结果 A组术后24 h引流量[（47±10）ml]、48 h血红蛋白变化值[（10±4）g/L]均低于B组[（110±25）ml、（16±5）g/L]及C组[（131±22）ml、（18±6）g/L]，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。B组术后24 h引流量低于C组，差异有统计学意义（q=5.241，P＜0.05），B组术后48 h血红蛋白变化值与C组比较，差异无统计学意义。结论 老年股骨颈骨折患者行人工股骨头置换术关闭切口时静脉滴注1%氨甲环酸1 g+关节周围软组织局部注射5%氨甲环酸20 ml+缝合伤口后经引流管注射5%氨甲环酸20 ml浸泡2 h可以明显减少术后引流量及血红蛋白变化值。人工股骨头置换术中关节周围软组织局部注射氨甲环酸+缝合伤口后经引流管推注氨甲环酸浸泡2 h可减少术后引流量，对血红蛋白变化值无影响。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the effect of tranexamic acid in different application methods on the amount of drainage after femoral head replacement in elderly femoral neck fractures. Methods A prospective study was performed in 75 cases of femoral neck fractures who had underwent femoral head replacement in Xiangya Medical College of Central South University, Department of orthopedics center of Haikou Hospital. Patients were randomly divided into group A, group B and group C, 25 cases in each group. Group A gave 1 g 1% tranexamicacid though intravenous drip infusion before closing the incision + local injection of 20 ml 5% tranexamic acid into periarticular soft tissue before closing the incision + a bolus of 20 ml 5% tranexamic acid through drainage tube after suturing the wound and soaking 2 hours. Patients in group B gave intravenous drip infusion of 100 ml normal saline before closing the incision and local injection of 20 ml 5% tranexamic acid into periarticular soft tissue before closing the incision + a bolus of 20 ml 5% tranexamic acid through drainage tube after suturing the wound and soaking two hours. In group C intravenous drip infusion of 100 ml normal saline was given before closing the incision and local injection of 20 ml normal saline to periarticular soft tissue before closing the incision + a bolus of 20 ml normal saline through drainage tube after suturing the wound and soaking 2 hours. The wound drainage of three groups at 24 hours after operation and the hemoglobin changes after 48 hours were evaluated. Results Twenty-four hours postoperative drainage, hemoglobin variation in 48 hours after operation of group A [(47±10)ml, (10±4)g/L] was significantly lower than group B [(110±25)ml, (16±5)g/L] and group C[(131±22)ml, (18±6)g/L], the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). 24 hours postoperative drainage of group B was lower than that of group C, difference was statistically significant (q=5.241, P<0.05). Hemoglobin variation in 48 hours after operation of group B was not significantly reduced compared with group C (q=0.721, P>0.05). Conclusions The intravenous drip of 1 g 1% tranexamic acid and local injection of 20 ml 5% tranexamic acid in periarticular soft tissue + local injection of 20 ml 5% tranexamic acid into periarticular soft tissue before closing the incision + a bolus of 20 ml 5%tranexamic acid through drainage tube after suturing the wound and soaking 2 hours can significantly reduce drainage and hemoglobin change value in elderly femoral neck fracture patients with artificial femoral head replacement. Local injection of tranexamic acid in periarticular soft tissue during artificial femoral head replacement and injection of tranexamic acid though drainage tube after suturing the wound and soaking for 2 hours can reduce the postoperative drainage, but have no effect on the hemoglobin change.

参考文献/References:

1 Tobias JD. Strategies for minimizing blood loss in orthopedic surgery [J]. Semin Hematol, 2004, 41(1, 1): 145-156.
2 Sabatini L, Trecci A, Imarisio D, et al. Fibrin tissue adhesive reduces postoperative blood loss in total knee arthroplasty [J]. J Orthop Traumatol, 2012, 13(3): 145-151.
3 Hoylaerts M, Lijnen HR, Collen D. Studies on the mechanism of the antifibrinolytic action of tranexamic acid [J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1981, 673(1): 75-85.
4 王浩洋, 康鹏德, 裴福兴, 等. 氨甲环酸减少全髋关节置换术围手术期失血的有效性及安全性研究 [J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2015, 4(8): 649-654.
5 Oremus K, Sostaric S, Trkulja V, et al. Influence of tranexamic acid on postoperative autologous blood retransfusion in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Transfusion, 2014, 54(1): 31-41.
6 McConnell JS, Shewale S,Munro NA, et al. Reduction ofblood loss in primary hip arthroplasty with tranexamic acid orfibrin spray [J]. Acta Orthop, 2011, 82(6):660-663.
7 岳辰, 周宗科, 裴福兴, 等. 中国髋、膝关节置换术围术期抗纤溶药序贯抗凝血药应用方案的专家共识 [J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2015, 8(4): 281-285.
8 Irwin A, Khan SK, Jameson SS, et al. Oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid in enhanced-recovery primary total hip and knee replacement: results of 3000 procedures [J]. Bone Joint J, 2013, 95-B(11): 1556-1561.
9 Machin JT, Batta V, Soler JA, et al. Comparison of intra-operative re gimes of tranexamic acid administration in primary total hip replacement [J]. Acta Orthop Belg, 2014, 80(2): 228-233.
10 Shemshak H,Nourian SMA, Nourian N, etal. One step closer to sparing total blood loss and transfusion rateintoalkneearthroplasty:aMeta-analysis of different methods of tranexamic acid administration [J].ArchOrthopTraumasSurg,2015,135(4):573-588.
11 HeP, ZhangZ, LiY, etal. Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in bilateral total knee replacement: A meta-analysis and systemaic review [J]. Med Sci Moni, 2015, 11(2): 3634.
12 李晖, 郑永发, 冯世庆, 等. 全膝关节置换术后不同引流方式的临床对比研究 [J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2013, 33(8): 815-819.
13 Alshryda S, Sukeik M, Sarda P, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the topical administration of tranexamic acid in total hip and knee replacement [J]. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96-B(8): 1005-1015.
14 Zhou XD, Tao LJ, Li J, et al. Do we really need tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of nineteen randomized controlled trials [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2013, 133(7): 1017-1027.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐明 付志厚 孙海宁 曲新涛 于秀淳.腓骨近端截骨与单髁关节置换治疗膝关节内侧单间室骨关节炎的疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(01):26.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.006]
　Xu Ming,Fu Zhihou,Sun Haining,et al.Comparison study of proximal fibular osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medialcompartment osteoarthritis of the knee[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):26.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.006]
[2]杨朝君 孙智文 田洪涛.腓骨近端截骨术与人工全膝关节置换术治疗内翻型膝关节骨关节炎的短期疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(01):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.008]
　Yang Zhaojun,Sun Zhiwen,Tian Hongtao.Comparison on the short term treatment of varus knee osteoarthritis by proximal fibular osteotomy versus total knee arthroplasty[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.01.008]
[3]李雪靖,张雪松,刘思思,等.腓骨近端截骨联合关节镜下清理治疗内翻型膝关节骨关节炎的成本效果分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(04):222.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.006]
　Li Xuejing,Zhang Xuesong,Liu Sisi,et al.Cost-effectiveness analysis of proximal fibular osteotomy combined with arthroscopy debridement for medial compartment knee ostoarthritis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):222.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.006]
[4]张静,李志锐,唐佩福.老年粗隆间骨折的手术治疗进展[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2016,(04):250.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.011]
　Li Zhirui,Zhang Jing,Tang Peifu.Progress of surgical treatment for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2016,(03):250.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2016.04.011]
[5]黄晓文,公茂琪,查晔军,等.早期快速闭合复位空心钉内固定治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的临床研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(01):4.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.002]
　Huang Xiaowen,Gong Maoqi,Zha Yejun,et al.Clinical results of early and rapid close reduction with internal fixation cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):4.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.01.002]
[6]李佳,刘勃,董天华,等.2010-2011年我国西南地区 11所医院 60岁以上股骨颈骨折患者的流行病学特征分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):116.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.010]
　Li Jia,Liu Bo,Dong Tianhua,et al.Epidemiological analysis of femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years in Southwest China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):116.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.010]
[7]陈佳,李西成.髋部骨折：争议与挑战[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):193.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.001]
　Chen Jia,Li Xicheng.Hip fracture: Controversy and challenge[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):193.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.001]
[8]扈鑫,高石军,董江涛,等.中老年全膝关节置换术后下肢深静脉血栓形成的解剖部位分布特点[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(05):296.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.009]
　Hu Xin,Gao Shijun,Dong Jiangtao,et al.The anatomical distribution of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis of middle-aged, and older patients after total knee arthroplasty[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):296.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.009]
[9]董天华,李石伦,于沂阳,等.中国南方和北方地区2010-2011年60岁以上人群股骨颈骨折流行病学对比[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(05):310.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.012]
　Dong Tianhua,Li Shilun,Yu Yiyang,et al.Epidemiological investigation of geriatric femoral neck fractures in south and north areas of China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):310.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.05.012]
[10]李佳,刘勃,刘松,等.中国中西部地区2010至2011年60岁以上股骨颈骨折流行病学对比[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2018,(01):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.009]
　Li Jia,Liu Bo,Liu Song,et al.Epidemiological analysis of femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years between middle and west areas of China from 2010 to 2011[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2018,(03):38.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2018.01.009]
[11]李涛,王英振,李玉龙,等.骨水泥与非骨水泥半髋关节置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折安全性的 Meta分析[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(02):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.008]
　Li Tao,Wang Yingzhen,Li Yulong,et al.Safety of cement and cementless hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta- analysis[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):109.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.02.008]
[12]贾建波,禹宝庆,吴良浩,等.传统后路与微创 SuperPath入路的半髋置换治疗老年股骨颈骨折疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2017,(04):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
　Jia Jianbo,Yu Baoqing,Wu Lianghao,et al.Hip hemiarthroplasty for senile femoral neck fractures: minimally invasive SuperPath approach versus traditional posterior approach[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2017,(03):223.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2017.04.006]
[13]茹江英,廖启宇,温国洪,等.直接前方入路和后外侧入路半髋关节置换治疗老年痴呆股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2024,(05):287.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2024.05.005]
　Ru Jiangying,Liao Qiyu,Wen Guohong,et al.Comparison of clinical efficacy between hemiarthroplasty via direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach for femoral neck fracture associated with senile dementia[J].Chin J Geriatr Orthop Rehabil(Electronic Edition),2024,(03):287.[doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2024.05.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目：海南省自然科学基金项目（814379）
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-22